1. Amy, M.: Towards large-scale functional verification of universal quantum circuits. Electron. Proc. Theor. Comput. Sci. 287, 1–21 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4204/eptcs.287.1

  2. Bobot, F., Filliâtre, J.C., Marché, C., Paskevich, A.: Why3: Shepherd your herd of provers. In: Boogie 2011: First International Workshop on Intermediate Verification Languages (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, Y., Chung, K., Hsieh, M., Huang, W., Lengál, O., Lin, J., Tsai, W.: AutoQ 2.0: From verification of quantum circuits to verification of quantum programs. In: Gurfinkel, A., Heule, M. (eds.) Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems - 31st International Conference, TACAS 2025, Held as Part of the International Joint Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2025, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 3–8 May 2025, Proceedings, Part III. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 15698, pp. 87–108. Springer, Heidelberg (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-90660-2_5

  4. Gottesman, D.: The heisenberg representation of quantum computers. arXiv preprint quant-ph/9807006 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gottesman, D.: The heisenberg representation of quantum computers. In: Group22: Proceedings of the XXII International Colloquium on Group Theoretical Methods in Physics. pp. 32–43. No. LA-UR-98-2848, International Press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hein, M., Dür, W., Eisert, J., Raussendorf, R., den Nest, M.V., Briegel, H.J.: Entanglement in graph states and its applications (2006). https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0602096

  7. Hein, M., Eisert, J., Briegel, H.J.: Multiparty entanglement in graph states. Phys. Rev. A 69(6) (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.69.062311

  8. Huang, Q., Zhou, L., Fang, W., Zhao, M., Ying, M.: Efficient formal verification of quantum error correcting programs. Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 9(PLDI), 190 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1145/3729293

  9. Liu, J., et al.: Quantum hoare logic. Archive of Formal Proofs (2019). https://isa-afp.org/entries/QHLProver.html, Formal proof development

  10. de Moura, L., Bjørner, N.: Z3: an efficient SMT solver. In: Ramakrishnan, C.R., Rehof, J. (eds.) TACAS 2008. LNCS, vol. 4963, pp. 337–340. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78800-3_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Nielsen, M.A., Chuang, I.L.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, 10th Anniversary Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976667

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Shor, P.W.: Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory. Phys. Rev. A 52, R2493–R2496 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.52.R2493. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.52.R2493

  13. Steane, A.: Multiple-particle interference and quantum error correction. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 452(1954), 2551–2577 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1996.0136

  14. Sundaram, A., Rand, R., Singhal, K., Lackey, B.: Hoare meets heisenberg: a lightweight logic for quantum programs (2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.08939

  15. Team, T.R.: The Rocq proof assistant. https://rocq-prover.org/. Accessed 14 Mar 2025

  16. The INQWIRE Developers: INQWIRE QuantumLib (2022). https://github.com/inQWIRE/QuantumLib

  17. Unruh, D.: Quantum hoare logic with ghost variables. In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LICS ’19, pp. 1–13. IEEE Computer Society (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.2019.8785779

  18. Wu, A., Li, G., Zhang, H., Guerreschi, G.G., Xie, Y., Ding, Y.: Qecv: quantum error correction verification (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ying, M.: Floyd-hoare Logic for Quantum Programs. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 33(6), 19 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2049706.2049708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou, L., Barthe, G., Strub, P.Y., Liu, J., Ying, M.: Coqq: foundational verification of quantum programs. Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 7(POPL), 833–865 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou, L., Yu, N., Ying, M.: An applied quantum Hoare logic. In: Proceedings of the 40th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, PLDI ’19, pp. 1149–1162. ACM (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3314221.3314584. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/140615/2/3314221.3314584.pdf