Noam Chomsky: U.S. Must Improve Relations with Russia and Challenge the Expansion of NATO | Democracy Now!

Noam Chomsky: U.S. Must Improve Relations with Russia and Challenge the Expansion of NATO | Democracy Now!
You turn to us for voices you won't hear anywhere else.
Sign up for Democracy Now!'s Daily Digest
to get our latest headlines and stories delivered to your inbox every day.
Daily Shows
Web Exclusives
Topics
Columns
Editions
Follow
Daily Digest
RSS & Podcasts
Android App
iPhone App
Democracy Now!
About
Events
Contact
Stations
Get Involved
Education
Jobs
For Broadcasters
Hot Topics
Iran
Lebanon
Israel & Palestine
Jeffrey Epstein
Immigration
Cuba
Gaza
Jesse Jackson
Minnesota
Venezuela
Noam Chomsky: U.S. Must Improve Relations with Russia and Challenge the Expansion of
NATO
Story
July 30, 2018
Watch Full Show
Watch Full Show
Next Story
Listen
Media Options
Listen
Media Options
Download Video
Download Audio
Other Formats
Media Options
Download Video
Download Audio
Other Formats
This is viewer supported news. Please do your part today.
Donate
Related
Topics
Guests
Transcript
Topics
Russia
NATO
Guests
Noam Chomsky
world-renowned political dissident, author and linguist. He is a laureate professor in the Department of Linguistics at the University of Arizona and professor emeritus at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he taught for more than 50 years. His recent books include
Global Discontents: Conversations on the Rising Threats to Democracy
and
Requiem for the American Dream: The 10 Principles of Concentration of Wealth & Power
This is viewer supported news. Please do your part today.
Donate
Russian President Vladimir Putin has invited President Trump to Moscow, just days after the White House postponed a planned meeting between the two leaders in Washington until after the midterm elections. The invitation to Moscow comes after Trump and Putin met for a summit in Helsinki, Finland, earlier this month. For more about U.S.-Russian relations, we speak with world-renowned political dissident, author and linguist Noam Chomsky. He is a laureate professor in the Department of Linguistics at the University of Arizona and professor emeritus at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he taught for more than 50 years.
This is viewer supported news. Please do your part today.
Donate
More from this Interview
Part 1: Noam Chomsky: U.S. Must Improve Relations with Russia and Challenge the Expansion of
NATO
Part 2: Noam Chomsky: Survival of Organized Human Life Is At Risk Due to Climate Change & Nuclear Weapons
Part 3: Noam Chomsky Condemns Israel’s Shift to Far Right & New “Jewish Nation-State” Law
Part 4: Amid Deadly Israeli Crackdown on Gaza Protests, Chomsky Says U.S. Must End Support for “Murderers”
Topics
Russia
NATO
Guests
Noam Chomsky
world-renowned political dissident, author and linguist. He is a laureate professor in the Department of Linguistics at the University of Arizona and professor emeritus at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he taught for more than 50 years. His recent books include
Global Discontents: Conversations on the Rising Threats to Democracy
and
Requiem for the American Dream: The 10 Principles of Concentration of Wealth & Power
Transcript
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
AMY
GOODMAN
Russian President Vladimir Putin has invited President Trump to Moscow, just days after the White House postponed a planned summit between the two leaders in Washington until after the midterm elections. Well, to talk more about U.S.-Russian relations and much more, we’re spending the hour with the world-renowned political dissident, author and linguist Noam Chomsky. He is now laureate professor in the Department of Linguistics at the University of Arizona and professor emeritus at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he taught for more than 50 years. His recent books include
Global Discontents: Conversations on the Rising Threats to Democracy
and
Requiem for the American Dream: The 10 Principles of Concentration of Wealth & Power
. He joined us from Tucson, Arizona, last week. I asked him about the recent Trump-Putin summit in Helsinki and played for him a short pinwheel of U.S. media coverage of the summit.
ANDERSON
COOPER
You have been watching perhaps one of the most disgraceful performances by an American president at a summit in front of a Russian leader, certainly that I’ve ever seen.
GEORGE
STEPHANOPOULOS
All of you who are watching today will be able to tell your friends, family, your children, your grandchildren you were watching a moment of history. It may not be for the right reasons.
NORAH
O’DONNELL:
This Helsinki summit was one for the history books. President Trump’s refusal to challenge the Russian strongman drew widespread condemnation from members of his own party and administration. This summit, that might have been about U.S. condemnation, instead ended with President Putin giving President Trump a soccer ball from the World Cup, and Mr. Trump handing Putin a gift of absolution.
AMY
GOODMAN
So that was CBS’s Norah O’Donnell, George Stephanopoulos of
ABC
News and CNN’s Anderson Cooper, reporting after the July 16 joint press conference with Trump and Putin. I asked Noam Chomsky for his response to the Helsinki summit.
NOAM
CHOMSKY
Trump has basically one principle: me first. That’s almost all of his policies, and wild statements and so on are perfectly well explicable within—under the assumption that that’s what’s driving him. Now, that—crucially, for him, he has to ensure that the Mueller investigation is discredited. Whatever they come up with, if it implicates him in any way, the way the media and political culture function, that will be considered of enormous significance, much more significance than his pursuing policies on the environment which may destroy human civilization. But given that, those highly skewed circumstances, he has to make sure that the Mueller investigation is discredited. And that was the main core part of his interview with Trump. Putting aside the way he behaved, you know, the soccer ball, which apparently had a listening device embedded in it and so on, yes, that was strange and unpleasant and so on.
AMY
GOODMAN
Well, actually, that World—that soccer ball, that particular ball has that little device in it, and that’s how it’s sold. It was a World Cup soccer ball, and that’s what it—that’s one of its attributes that people like, that they can put their iPhone next to it and get information.
NOAM
CHOMSKY
Yeah, well, Putin was plainly treating Trump, more or less, with contempt. So, whatever you think about that, nevertheless his—the main concern—his main concern was pretty obvious. And that was the center part—central part of the Putin-Trump interviews. And so, yeah, I think—I just don’t see the great significance of his acting in a silly and childish way in an interview. OK, let’s—he did. Now let’s go to the important issues which are not being discussed. The issue of improving relations with Russia is of overwhelming significance as compared with the remarks saying, “Well, I don’t know whether to trust my own intelligence agencies,” for—saying that for perfectly obvious reasons: to discredit the Mueller investigation and to ensure that his fervently loyal base stays supportive. That’s not an attractive policy, but we can understand very easily what he’s doing.
AMY
GOODMAN
Those intelligence agencies—former
CIA
Director John Brennan tweeted, “Donald Trump’s press conference performance in Helsinki rises to & exceeds the threshold of 'high crimes & misdemeanors.' It was nothing short of treasonous. Not only were Trump’s comments imbecilic, he is wholly in the pocket of Putin. Republican Patriots: Where are you???” Again, the former
CIA
Director John Brennan’s tweet. Noam?
NOAM
CHOMSKY
Well, his remarks were certainly incorrect. Whatever you think of Trump’s behavior, it has nothing to do with high crimes and misdemeanors or treason. That’s just not true. But again, the same point I’ve been trying to make throughout, we are focusing on issues of minor significance and putting aside problems of enormous importance and significance, whether we’re thinking of how to deal with immigration or whether we’re dealing with the question of survival of organized human life on Earth. Those are the topics we should be thinking about, not whether Trump misbehaved in a press conference.
AMY
GOODMAN
Noam Chomsky, I wanted to ask you about
NATO
. President Trump has questioned a key provision of the
NATO
military alliance: the mutual defense of
NATO
member countries. He made this remark during an interview with Fox News host Tucker Carlson just a week ago.
TUCKER
CARLSON
Why should my son go to Montenegro to defend it from attack? Why is that—
PRESIDENT
DONALD
TRUMP
I understand what you’re saying. I’ve asked the same question. You know, Montenegro is a tiny country with very strong people.
TUCKER
CARLSON
Yeah, I’m not against Montenegro.
PRESIDENT
DONALD
TRUMP
Right.
TUCKER
CARLSON
Or Albania.
PRESIDENT
DONALD
TRUMP
No, by the way, they’re very strong people. They have very aggressive people. They may get aggressive, and, congratulations, you’re in World War
III
AMY
GOODMAN
There’s President Trump, questioning the whole idea of
NATO
. Well, if you could specifically address this? Interesting he chose Montenegro, where, well, many months ago, when he was with the G7, the G8, he pushed aside the prime minister of Montenegro. But the bigger point about—well, he wasn’t making this point, but I’d like to ask you about whether you feel
NATO
should exist.
NOAM
CHOMSKY
That’s the crucial question, not whether Trump made an ugly and demeaning comment about a tiny country. But what is
NATO
for? For from the beginning, from its origins, we had drilled into our heads that the purpose of
NATO
was to defend us from the Russian hordes. We can put aside for the moment the question whether that was accurate. But let’s—in any event, that was the dominant theme, overwhelming, in fact, unique theme. OK, 1991, no more Russian hordes. So, the question is: Why
NATO
Well, what happened was very interesting. There were negotiations, between George Bush, the first; James Baker, secretary of state; Mikhail Gorbachev; Genscher and Kohl, the Germans, on how to deal with the—this was after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the beginning of the collapse of the Soviet Union. Gorbachev made an astonishing concession. Astonishing. He agreed to allow Germany, now unified, to join NATO—a hostile military alliance. Just look at the history of the preceding years. Germany alone had practically destroyed Russia, at an extraordinary cost, several times during the preceding century. But he agreed to allow Germany to—a rearmed Germany to join
NATO
, a military alliance that was set up to counter Russia. There was a
quid pro quo
, namely that
NATO
not—meaning
NATO
means basically U.S. forces—not expand to East Berlin, to East Germany. Nobody talked about anything beyond that. Baker and Bush verbally agreed to that. They didn’t put it in writing, but they essentially said, “Yeah, we will”—in fact, the phrase that was used was “not one inch to the east.” Well, what happened?
NATO
immediately moved to East Germany. Under Clinton, other countries, former Russian satellites, were introduced into
NATO
. Finally,
NATO
went so far, as I mentioned before, 2008, again in 2013, to suggest that even Ukraine, right at the heartland of Russian strategic concerns—any Russian president, no matter who it was, any Russian leader—that they join
NATO
So, what’s
NATO
doing altogether? Well, actually, its mission was changed. The official mission of
NATO
was changed to become to be—to control and safeguard the global energy system, sea lanes, pipelines and so on. And, of course, on the side, it’s acting as a intervention force for the United States. Is that a legitimate reason for us to maintain
NATO
, to be an instrument for U.S. global domination? I think that’s a rather serious question. That’s not the question that’s asked. The question that’s asked is whether
NATO
made—whether Trump made some demeaning comment about Montenegro. It’s another example of what I was talking about before: the focus of the media and the political class, and the intellectual community in general, on marginalia, overlooking critical and crucial issues, issues which do literally have to do with human survival.
AMY
GOODMAN
Noam Chomsky, now linguistics professor at the University of Arizona, Tucson. Coming up, we’ll talk to him about climate change, nuclear weapons, Israel, Gaza and more.
The original content of this program is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License
. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.
Next story from this daily show
Noam Chomsky: Survival of Organized Human Life Is At Risk Due to Climate Change & Nuclear Weapons
More from this Interview
Part 1: Noam Chomsky: U.S. Must Improve Relations with Russia and Challenge the Expansion of
NATO
Part 2: Noam Chomsky: Survival of Organized Human Life Is At Risk Due to Climate Change & Nuclear Weapons
Part 3: Noam Chomsky Condemns Israel’s Shift to Far Right & New “Jewish Nation-State” Law
Part 4: Amid Deadly Israeli Crackdown on Gaza Protests, Chomsky Says U.S. Must End Support for “Murderers”
Daily News Digest
Our Daily Digest brings Democracy Now! to your inbox each morning.
Speaking Events
Apr
25
Portland, OR
Amy Goodman In Person at Portland, OR Theatrical Opening of Steal This Story, Please!
30th Anniversary Event
Watch: Celebrating 30 Years of Independent Global News with Democracy Now!
Special guests Angela Davis, Bruce Springsteen, Patti Smith, Michael Stipe and more came together to celebrate 30 years of Democracy Now! at a sold out Riverside Church event in NYC on March 23, 2026.
Recent News
How Hawkish Democrats, from Schumer to Harris, Paved the Way for War with Iran: Stephen Zunes
The Looming Food Crisis: Why the Strait of Hormuz Is Disrupting Global Agriculture
Betting on War: Mysterious Traders Make Millions on Well-Timed Bets Tied to Trump’s War on Iran
AI Data Center Resistance: Maine Passes Nation’s First Statewide Moratorium — Will Gov. Mills Sign It?
“Colossus Failure”: Elon Musk’s Data Centers Face Lawsuit for Polluting Black Neighborhoods in Memphis
Headlines for April 23
Watch
Read
Iran Says It’s Collecting Tolls for Ships Transiting Strait of Hormuz
Senate Republicans Defeat Iran War Powers Resolution for Fifth Time
Pentagon Fires Navy Secretary John Phelan After Clashes with Hegseth
Despite Ceasefire, Israel Kills 5 in Lebanon, Including Journalist Amal Khalil
FBI
Launched Probe of New York Times Reporter Following Unflattering Coverage of Kash Patel
Democratic Rep. David Scott of Georgia Dies at 80
Toxic Gas Release at West Virginia Metal Refining Plant Kills 2, Injures 30 Others
American Lung Association: Nearly Half of U.S. Children Are Breathing Dangerous Air Pollution
Houston City Council Votes to Gut an Ordinance Limiting Police Cooperation with
ICE
U.S. Appeals Court Upholds Texas Law Requiring Classrooms to Display Ten Commandments
Pope Leo Wraps Up Four-Nation Visit to Africa
NYC
Councilmember Chi Ossé Released After Violent Arrest at Anti-Eviction Protest
View All
View All
Most popular
Military Veterans and Family Members Arrested in Capitol Hill Protest Against Iran War
Forest Firings: Trump Admin Aims to “Break the Forest Service,” Nearly 200 Million Acres at Stake
Who Is Breaking International Law in the Strait of Hormuz? It’s Not Iran, Says Scholar
How Hawkish Democrats, from Schumer to Harris, Paved the Way for War with Iran: Stephen Zunes
Non-commercial news needs your support
We rely on contributions from our viewers and listeners to do our work.
Please do your part today.
Make a donation
Top