ވިކިޕީޑިއާ:Protected page - ވިކިޕީޑިއާ

ވިކިޕީޑިއާ:Protected page - ވިކިޕީޑިއާ
Jump to content
ވިކިޕީޑިއާ، މިނިވަން އެކުމާފާނުން
Shortcut
[[
WP:PP
WP:PROT
]]
Note: pages permanently protected because of visibility or legal reasons are now listed separately at
Wikipedia:List of indefinitely protected pages
Note: pages protected as a {
deletedpage
}} or redirect to another page are now listed separately at
Wikipedia:List of pages protected against re-creation
Note: You can request protection and unprotection at
Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
Administrators
have the ability to "protect" pages or images so that they cannot be modified except by other admins (the link "
މި ޞަފްޙާއަށް އުނިއިތުރު ގެންނަވާ
" is replaced by a link "
މަސްދަރު ބައްލަވާ
" when viewed by non-admins). This ability is only to be used in limited circumstances.
Admins
must not
protect pages they are actively engaged in editing, except in the case of
simple vandalism
Articles linked from the main page should NOT be protected (full or semi) except to clean up vandalism. Protection should be kept to 10-15 minutes in these cases.
Policy
އުނިއިތުރު ގެންނަވާ
Do not edit a temporarily protected page except to add a protected page notice.
Do not protect a page on which you are involved in an
edit dispute
Category:Conflicts
).
See
Wikipedia:Protection policy
for more detailed advice and the purpose of protected pages.
Procedure
އުނިއިތުރު ގެންނަވާ
Protect the page, supplying a reason.
Add
{{protected}}
(or
{{vprotected}}
for vandalism) to the top of the temporarily protected page and make mention of the protection in the edit summary.
List pages you protect on
Wikipedia:Protected page
; if it is protected due to a conflict, you may want to list
all
user names/IPs involved in the conflict.
Please use
{{article|ARTICLE NAME}}
when listing a page at
Wikipedia:Protected page
, where
ARTICLE NAME
is the article or page you wish to protect.
Consider encouraging a resolution between the disputing parties.
Remove the protection (while supplying a reason) once the conflict has been resolved.
Remove
{{protected}}
from the top of an unprotected page and make mention of the removal in the edit summary.
See also
އުނިއިތުރު ގެންނަވާ
Wikipedia:List of permanently protected pages
- please list long-term protections here.
Requests for page protection
- place to request protection; use when your involvement in editing a page precludes protecting it yourself. Also used by non-administrators who wish for a page to be protected. Also for unprotection requests.
Protection log
- automated log of protections and unprotections
This page is protected
Wikipedia maintenance section on maintaining this page
Wikipedia:Most vandalized pages
- please add pages subjected to repeated vandalism to this list
m:Protected pages considered harmful
- essay
m:The Wrong Version
- semi-humorous essay about reverting warriors' perception of page protection
Template:Editprotected
- enables a streamline process to edit protected pages by quickly putting up requests
Rationale
އުނިއިތުރު ގެންނަވާ
See
meta:Protected pages considered harmful
meta:edit wars
Instructions
އުނިއިތުރު ގެންނަވާ
If you protect a page, or find a protected page not listed here, please add it below, to the appropriate sections. Please also add a
short
description of ten words or less indicating why you protected it. If you need to say more, discuss on the talk page of the page you protected. Also see the
protection log
for recent unprotections, which replaces the manual list of recently unprotected pages. The
{{protected}}
header automatically adds
Category:Protected
to the page, adding it to the Category's listing.
Pages protected due to
WP:OFFICE
guidelines
އުނިއިތުރު ގެންނަވާ
Per
Jimbo Wales
, some articles are being protected by
User:Danny
due to complaints at Wikimedia's office. Please do not unprotect these without asking Danny first
ފަންވަތް:Article
- vandalism. Protected by
Danny
per
WP:OFFICE
howch
ng
chat
00:32, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- protected on 1/23 by
User:Jimbo Wales
. OFFICE. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
10:59, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- semi-protected per
Danny
's request --
Shanel
22:24, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- Until work is completed there.
Danny
21:12, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Pages protected only against moves
އުނިއިތުރު ގެންނަވާ
Please ensure that you add
{{
moveprotected
}} to the top of a move-locked page. New protections should be added at the
bottom
of this list.
ފަންވަތް:Non-article
, just noticed this, not sure why else except for the obvious visibility.
Dmcdevit
01:21, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Non-article
Protected way back due to reasons of visibility.
Geni
10:55, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
Protected from moving to something abusive.
Redwolf24
04:39, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Non-article
visibility reasons.
Shanes
04:19, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Non-article
should not be moved without consensus on talk page. Sudden moving of widely used Wikipedia systems disrupts wikipedia. --
Phroziac
talk
21:54, September 9, 2005 (UTC)
Nidhogg
- Note that a "vote" is going on about whether it should be moved from the foreign language title to English - I have moved it there already, and have suggested that the vote be reframed to whether it should be moved
away
from the move-protected English title.
Uncle Ed
20:47, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
I have unprotected the page for moves, since there is no active page-move back and forth. If such occurs, the page can easily be re-protected.
Cimon avaro; on a pogostick.
00:22, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Non-article
User:Docglasgow
protected this a while ago... I unprotected and then reprotected today after not knowing what's going on. --
Nlu
talk
) 02:42, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
. Look at
what happened
to the
United States
Tito
xd
?!?
did you read this?
23:21, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
what happened
. 'nuff said.
ugen64
23:29, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
IANLEELOVE
talk
contribs
) keeps moving it to titles such as "Mr Ian Lee" (which is now a redirect) or even "Mr Ian 'the man' Lee" (which I've deleted twice now). These moves are done against the consensus of the other editors at that article, and without discussion.
Lupo
13:35, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
Controversy and multiple moves, plus a recent
WP:RM
descision.
WhiteNight
06:30, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
pages with long edit history. -- User:Docu
ފަންވަތް:Article
- some editor has decided that he know a better name, contrary to naming convention of other Polish monarchs. Page protected from moves until discussion (between this user and rest of editors) is resolved on talk page.--
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
Talk
03:54, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
Repeatedly moved without consensus.
Mark
your words
19:19, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Pages protected due to edit wars or vandalism
This list always needs pruning. Wikipedia works perfectly fine on a protection cycle of less than one week. Please examine older listings and unprotect if at all possible. If you add an article here, please remember to check the talk page frequently, and always consider removing protection as soon as possible.
Real articles
Full protection
e ,efvqbjlsqd,dbakadqqbvsjhvsafe also
Category:Protected
Category:Protected against vandalism
and
Protection log
Latest at the
bottom,
please; and please sign all entries so we know how old they are.
Please ensure that you add one of the following templates at the top of a protected page:
{{
protected
}}
or
{{
vprotected
}}
in the case of vandalism.
12 Feb and before
ފަންވަތް:Article
repeated removal of photos and insertion of NPOV tags with no explanation offered, despite talk page entries dating back to 2 months ago on why they were kept. Disguised (persistent) vandalism, perhaps? --
Миборовский
Chugoku Banzai
05:16, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
From what I read on the talk page, they are almost ready for unprotection. Good. 7 weeks is excessive. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
11:38, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
Third attempt at protection in a month. People use edit wars to enforce their point.
Oleg Alexandrov
talk
) 02:27, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- protected by GregAsche on 1/27. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
09:42, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
It's being protected per decision of the mentors on the article (which would be me,
Katefan0
Jdavidb
and
Ral315
. If you want it unprotected, ask one of us and we will discuss it. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
12:12, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
edit war -
RexNL
22:55, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- edit war yet again.
howch
ng
chat
00:41, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- edit war involving the same parties as
ފަންވަތް:Article
howch
ng
chat
00:41, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
ފަންވަތް:Article
ފަންވަތް:Article
. All subject of a pernicious edit war mostly involving one user blocked multiple times for 3RR against consensus. I'm hoping protection will encourage him to come discuss the matter on the talk page as a last resort. If not, longer blocks may be necessary.
Katefan0
(scribble)
poll
16:49, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Oh, he comes and discuss on
Talk:Sea of Japan
all right -- he just thinks that he's absolutely right and people who disagree with him to be absolutely wrong. --
Nlu
talk
) 17:05, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Not encouraging =(
Katefan0
(scribble)
poll
17:13, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
edit war. --
a.n.o.n.y.m
18:16, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
"ROHA" returns. --
Nlu
talk
) 07:45, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
13 Feb to 19 Feb
ފަންވަތް:Article
- Edit war
Katefan0
(scribble)
poll
17:20, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- Redirect. Anon keeps forking the original article to push his own POV. Should be unprotected when things settle down. --
Conti
18:08, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- Edit war, protected by Essjay.--
Sean Black
(talk)
21:26, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
and
ފަންވަތް:Article
are protected, apparently as part of the "experimental" process on
Wikipedia:Stable versions
. This strikes me as rather dubious, but at at any rate it should presumably be done transparently, hence I'm listing here.
Alai
02:14, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
I rejected the request myself and nothing has changed since then. Sigh. I don't care if it's stable or not. I'm against protecting pages just to protect them, which is what this feels like. No one has touched them outside of legit editors. If they become high risk and high profile, fine, then protect, but right now it feels like a waste of protection. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
05:37, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
low level edit war and use of sockpuppets by one editor to avoid 3RR.--
MONGO
05:19, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
, edit warring over splitting article. Protected to encourage discussion.
the wub
"?!"
19:16, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- revert war. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
08:22, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
Edit war
Katefan0
(scribble)
poll
16:03, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
reversion war
. //
Pathoschild
admin
) 23:50, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
(edit war between two users)
Sceptr
Talk
13:36, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
compromise position to avoid wheel warring between other admins, and to allow discussion to continue. I believe there are also
WP:OFFICE
concerns.
Physchim62
(talk)
19:39, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
. Edit war. -
Will Beback
00:30, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- edit war is back. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
05:48, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- protected by Inter on 2/16. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
11:56, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- protected by Raul654 on 2/18. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
11:56, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- FP by Mr. Splash on 2/16. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
11:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
. Revert warring.--
Sean Black
(talk)
23:12, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
Edit war
Katefan0
(scribble)
poll
03:27, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
. Revert war and addition of potentially libellous content.
The Uninvited
Co.,
Inc.
05:11, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- Edit war during afd debate. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
06:26, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:La
- edit war with people using edit summaries to "discuss". --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
08:38, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- IP address edit warring.
Jayjg
(talk)
13:09, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- revert war. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
14:07, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- protected by JzG on 2/19. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
11:22, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
20 Feb to 26 Feb
ފަންވަތް:Article
- moved to full protect due to people getting around SP. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
09:14, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- protected by
User:CambridgeBayWeather
. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
09:14, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- revert war still continuing despite previous 12-hour cooling-down protection; protected until consensus is sorted out on talk page. --
Nick Boalch
?!?
11:27, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
protected after request from
FCYTravis
talk
contribs
blocks
protects
deletions
moves
: edit warring over OTRS concerns. Short protection term should be sufficient in first instance.
Physchim62
(talk)
22:02, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
Edit war
Katefan0
(scribble)
poll
13:19, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:La
- edit war. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
13:55, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:La
- long long simmering edit war. Goes back to mid December if not further. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
19:37, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:La
and
ފަންވަތް:La
- Same issue they had in mid December. What do they call it? oi. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
05:44, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:La
Edit war
Katefan0
(scribble)
poll
22:09, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:La
Sterile edit war.
Rhobite
00:57, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:La
- edit war. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
06:42, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Semi-protection
See also
Category:Semi-protected
and
Protection log
Latest at the
bottom,
please; and please sign all entries so we know how old they are.
Please ensure that you add
{{sprotected}}
at the top of the semi-protected page.
12 Feb and before
ފަންވަތް:Article
- unprotection is tried occasionally, but for the most part, this article is permanently SP. Keeping this here as a placeholder really. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
03:00, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- needs to be SP at least for awhile yet. Dispute has only stopped because the page is semi protected. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
03:21, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Non-article
, part of Wikipedia:Introduction, one of the first things many see. --
user:zanimum
ފަންވަތް:Article
is still suffering from DickyRoberts vandalism. Reprotected by Alkivar some time ago. -
Splash
talk
23:44, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- Semi-protected per
Arbcom ruling
. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
20:59, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- attempted unprotection on 2/7; anon reversions happened just over five hours later. I don't see this being lifted anytime soon.
android
79
20:06, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
protected by David Gerard.
howch
ng
chat
00:34, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
13 Feb to 19 Feb
ފަންވަތް:Article
moved from full to sem-protection. Some issues resolved on the Talk page, but emotional ranting from anons there suggest that it's still at risk. --
Mel Etitis
Μελ Ετητης
) 18:43, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
This was unprotected by
User:Splash
, since when it has been vandalised three times in sixteen hours, identically but from different IP addresses. --
Mel Etitis
Μελ Ετητης
) 18:14, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- part of the whole cartoons thing. Being hit hard. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
08:06, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:La
- protected by Essjay on 2/15. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
09:43, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- protected by Voice of All on 2/16. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
11:16, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- an anon keeps trying to use cut and paste to move the page to
Islamic Revolution
Angr
talk
10:51, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
Constant vandalism by students of the school.
ފަންވަތް:Article
- recent pattern of silly vandalism by different anon IPs.
BD2412
19:10, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- vandalism. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
07:17, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
seems to have a magnetic appeal for hilariously original edits like adding changing Jesus Christ to Spongebob Squarepants.
Just zis
Guy,
you know?
[T]
[C]
16:41, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- more vandalism
Sceptr
Talk
11:15, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- protected on 2/14. Vandalism. Good old YTMND. Oi. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
11:24, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- Anon persists in reinserting content deleted on AfD. --
cesarb
17:15, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- vandalism by several IPs.
Soothing
18:27, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- Eight anons editred in 24 hours, every single one vandals -
Cecropia
23:21, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
20 Feb to 26 Feb
ފަންވަތް:Article
- protected by Voice of All on 2/20. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
11:25, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- I realize it's highly unusual to protect a discussion page, but there seemed no alternative in this case. Repeated vandalism, as per the previous entry.
CJCurrie
23:46, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- Repeated vandalism, from a user who claims he will shift to another address if blocked.
CJCurrie
23:53, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- The article has been vandalized 20+ recently. I protected it for 48 hours with the intention of discouraging the vandals. I will lift the protection myself, word of honor.
Tony the Marine
01:34, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- Lots of linkspam by multiple IPs.
Soothing
08:03, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Same for
ފަންވަތް:Article
Soothing
08:08, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- Edit war.
CambridgeBayWeather
(Talk)
08:54, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- Persistent vandalism by someone with access to an apparently-large block of IPs.
android
79
18:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
. Continual insertion of POV comments from a blog. This isn't meant to be a long-term measure. I intend the semi-protection to stay just long enough to encourage whoever's doing it to leave.
enochlau
talk
) 14:37, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
I downgraded this to semi from VoA's full; maybe doesn't even need semi
William M. Connolley
23:03, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
Persistent edits by anon using a number of IPs against consensus and considered vandalism by editors of page.
Vsmith
23:46, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
as with Feb 8 semiprotection, IP vandalism over content dispute.
NSL
at 09:10
UTC
2006-02-22
09:10, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
persistent anon vandal with rapidly changing IP address. --
Martyman
(talk)
00:29, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:La
- Asian fetish vandal. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
14:01, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:La
- protected by David.Monniaux on 2/23. Needs to be short. 4-5 vandal edits a day isn't alot. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
11:22, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:La
- protected by alhutch on 2/24. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
11:28, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:La
- protected for the 2834th time on 2/22. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
11:28, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:La
SP for a few hours to foil dynamic IP vandal hitting this page pretty hard today.
Katefan0
(scribble)
poll
17:49, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:La
Wow. Insane amounts of vandalism.
Katefan0
(scribble)
poll
20:58, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:La
Anonymous user believes he has control over the page, and has been vandalising it (or something along those lines). User is blocked, but he has used more than one sockpuppet.
Deltabeignet
22:57, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
The talk page has been sprotected now as well --
Francs
2000
23:13, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:La
- vandalism. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
05:24, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Pages protected against spambot
See
Category:Protected against spambots
Other
Note:Pages protected against recreation should be placed at
Wikipedia:List_of_pages_protected_against_re-creation
ފަންވަތް:Ln
One editor making repeated tiny edits to heavily used template. Have left note on editor's page, suggesting he needs to work on a copy in the sandbox, rather than on the template itself. Should think this only needs to be a brief protection. 00:42, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Ln
: Edit war on whether to link to a list of times the admin has been blocked.
REAK OF
UR
TURE
TALK
03:56, Jan. 8, 2006
ފަންވަތް:Ln
: Edit war on the icon: flag or map. The map doesn't look right, but the flag is a problem for political reasons. For now, it has no icon - hopefully a equitable solution will be found soon, but the temperature is more than a little warm on the talk page.
Grutness
...
wha?
05:15, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- full protection from
Ardenn
talk
contribs
) changing the closing admin's decision text. I'll remove the protection in 15 minutes when Ardenn has cooled down, hopefully. Update - Not sure the user has agreed to not change it if I unprotect, so leaving protected for now. Should be minimal inpact, since it shouldnt be being changed anyhow. --
Syrthiss
22:03, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Image:Turks2.jpg
- edit war on
Turkish people
spilled over to this image.
howch
ng
chat
00:35, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Image:Jyllands-Posten Muhammad drawings.jpg
- a hugely controversial image undergoing repeated vandalism from multiple sources. This will almost certainly need to be protected for a long time - perhaps permanently, given the degree of animosity involved. --
ChrisO
21:47, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Image talk:Jyllands-Posten Muhammad drawings.jpg
- somewhat unusually, I've also had to protect the image's talk page; it's been picking up some very ugly comments of the kind which Jimbo blanked from the main article's talk page. Users are now redirected to
Talk:Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy
if they wish to discuss the image. Again, this will require long-term protection. --
ChrisO
09:57, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Category:Chinese_newspapers
- many edits in this category which was voted for deletion are being used as evidence in a
pending arbitration case
. I restored the deletion and protected the page while the case is being deliberated. After it has been concluded the protection can be removed and the category deleted. --
Wgfinley
13:47, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Ln
: Semiprotected. Talk header template with moderate visibility, repeatedly vandalized by anons. —
Ilmari Karonen
talk
03:47, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
Images protected while on the
Main Page
Images on the main page often become the target of vandalism, particularly being overwritten with
shock site
images, which harms the credibility of the project due to that page's extreme visibility. Also, it takes some time for sysops to determine what caused a main page change. As such, images have begun to be protected during their time there, and this has become a
de facto
policy since the second or third week of November 2004.
In order to keep track of these images, please add {{
ProtectedMainPageImage
}} to them. This will add the image to
Category:Protected main page images
. There are typically 4 to 5 images on the main page, although some of them may be from the
Wikicommons
Protected user pages
User pages sometimes become targets for
vandalism
, and may be protected upon request of the user associated with the page if this is a serious problem. Clear evidence can be seen from a user's history of the page, and their history from their discussion page.
By software configuration, script files (*.js) and stylesheets (*.css) in user spaces are protected such that only the user or an administrator can edit it.
Full protection
User talk:Freestylefrappe
Temporarily protected to ward off incivility.
Mackensen
(talk)
03:26, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
User:Lir
This user is banned for one year (ending 23 September 2006 as of 23 September 2005). This user's page has been repeatedly altered to conform to the banned user's wishes without the express authorization of the
Arbitration Committee
User:Journalist
(frequent vandalism
over 20 times)
User:Danny
User:Gerald Farinas
User:Kaihsu
User:Olivier
User:GeneralPatton
User:Chris 73
{page moves only)
User:Neutrality
(page moves only) - protected by
ugen
64
- frequent page move vandalism target
User:Nitram0002
User:Nitram0003
etc. Blocked sock puppet that comes back and removes sock puppet warnings.
User:Geogre
(page moves only) Because of vandal fighting, am anticipating a very quick attack. Protection from moves only desired, as I'll revert anything else.
User:AndreasPraefcke
, because of multi-project vandalism of this user's pages.
User:Mel Etitis
User:Mike Halterman
User:Babelfishs
-- Sockpuppet of banned user
MARMOT
User:Bank of Wikipedia
-- temporary protection as of 22:05, 9 July 2005 (UTC) until socks lose interest.
User:Weev
-- see
this version
to see why. This is to be
permanently
locked. -
Ta bu shi da yu
03:18, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
User:Bobbybuilder
User:Skyring
- User banned by ArbComm from Wikipedia on 12 August. Nevertheless returned to make edit (changing comment by another user, part of his usual strategy of trying to show he can break rules and seeing if he does it in a small way, how far can he get away with breaking them) on 15th. Have placed details of the ban on his userpage and protected page to stop its removal.
Fear
ÉIREANN
(caint)
ފަންވަތް:Article
Func
) 17:47, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
perm banned user for various offenses ranging from posting a list of Jewish wikipedians to posting instructions on how to best disrupt wikipedia using open proxies.
Jtkiefer
----- 20:32, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
Banned by the ArbCom for one year for leagal treates, continued vandalism and legal threats as an IP on page.--
nixie
01:39, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
to prevent continued edits to it by IP socks of perm banned user.
Jtkiefer
----- 02:41, September 8, 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
imposter of
User:Fenian_Swine
IP keeps vandalizing by restoring to copycat page of Fenian Swine's.
Jtkiefer
----- 20:31, September 10, 2005 (UTC)
User:Nihiltres
requested by user on
WP:RFPP
, being vandalized. --
cesarb
23:55, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
NOTE
: Vandal is known to have impersonated
User:Nihiltres
and asked for unprotection
. Be sure it's the real
User:Nihiltres
if unprotecting on request. --
cesarb
22:07, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
User:216.175.112.9
this is a non-static IP address, of which one user has taken possession, blanking explanation on the user page and "archiving" vandalism warnings on the Talk page. --
Mel Etitis
Μελ Ετητης
07:59, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
--
HappyCamper
21:34, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
User:DJ_Clayworth
- repeat vandalism by an AOL proxy IP
User:Chantin' Fox
- user page of a permablocked vandal. Page contained vandalism denigrating another (legitimate) user.
Lupo
12:49, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
User:BigDaddy777
and
User talk:BigDaddy777
Redwolf24
protected the user talk page on October 11th. I protected the user page on the same day. It was done because BigDaddy777 was blocked indefinitely, but continued to be disruptive. --
Woohookitty
09:14, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
Added the page of
User:68.40.168.173
and
User talk:68.40.168.173
. Sock of BD777. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
19:12, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
On November 16th, I changed the tag on the talk page because it had inadvertently created a User talk talk page. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
07:13, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
User:Aranda56
- protected at Aranda's request, since hurricanes force his absence and it has been vandalized several times. --
Maru
(talk)
Contributions
22:29, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
Image:Jdavidb.jpg
- used on my user page and vandalized; since this is a picture of myself and my child there should never be any need for anyone to change it. Not sure if this is within policy, but I'll unprotect if there's a problem.
Jdavidb
(talk)
15:50, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
User:Curps
User:snoyes
ފަންވަތް:Article
- socks of permanently blocked impostor changing this page to a redir.
Owen
00:21, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
User:Jake Remington
and
User talk:Jake Remington
- indefinitely blocked user. 2 of his sockpuppets have vandalized the pages and there's a possibility that they are using it to call other people in to vandalized. He's blocked indefinitely anyway. No reason not to protect. Similar to BigDaddy777 case up above. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
21:24, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
User:AI
AI is banned by
an ArbCom ruling
, yet their user page keeps getting edited and I'm tired of reverting. There's no reason to edit this page: AI cannot edit personally, and cannot reply to other people's edits. --
MarkSweep
(call me collect)
18:00, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
User:Voice of All(MTG)
-IP vandalism.
Voice
of
All
ESP
21:45, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
User:BrownPigeon
. Blocked sock puppet account of
user:Marcuse
, being vandalized by antagonist
user:Jonah Ayers
, all related to "
Biff Rose
". -
Willmcw
02:06, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- after being vandalized 168 times, decided to semi-protect it.
Owen
23:40, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
User:ERcheck
- semiprotected following spate of defacements by AOL IP addresses.
TenOfAllTrades
talk
) 15:00, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
User:B1link82
- blocked user. Protected on 12/30 by
User:Jpgordon
. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
11:51, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
User:SlimVirgin
Permanently protected in early November after
multiple bouts of rather horrifying vandalism
, which started up again whenever the page was unprotected.
Jayjg
(talk)
21:04, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Semi-protected
User:Dijxtra
semi'd upon request following persistent vandal. -
Splash
talk
03:07, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
User:Jason Gastrich
- semi protected since 12/28 by
User:Voice of All
. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
11:51, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
User:Naconkantari
- SP since 1/1/06 by
User:Doc glasgow
. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
11:51, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
User:Alkivar
- Semi protected.
User:AMbroodEY
per user request following persistent vandalism (9 times in quick succession).--
May the Force be with you!
Shreshth91
($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|)
15:15, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
User:IAAL
multiple IP vandalism, hopefully clear up soon.
Dragons flight
06:12, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
User:Irismeister
- lots of problems from this banned user recently.
Dmcdevit
19:50, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
User:Mistress Selina Kyle
this page was protected by
Fuzheado
on the 12 January.
Prodego
talk
00:50, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
Recurring vandalism.
jossi
19:51, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
Attacks by open proxies, may be sockpuppets of blocked user
User:VinnyCee
. --
Nlu
talk
) 09:31, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
Bunch of vandalism, semi-protected by
User:Fuzheado
, and I appreciate it. Based on pattern of vandalism, probably related to the vandalism of
User:Nescio
above. --
Nlu
talk
) 07:31, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
Insults from various IPs, apparently same vandal as above.
andy
12:24, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Protected user subpages and boilerplates
Some users have created boilerplate pages in their user namespace and protected them from editing. The appropriateness of doing this is disputed.
User:Blankfaze/Greet
User:Blankfaze/VW
User:David Newton/Bird Dispute
User:Davidcannon/Biotable
User:Davidcannon/Honours
User:Davidcannon/Index-1
User:Davidcannon/Index
User:Dori/Copyrights
User:Dori/Disclaimers
User:Eloquence/Boilerplate texts
User:Gerald Farinas/index
User:Lupo/Do not copyvio
User:Lupo/Img Src
User:Lupo/Welcome
User:Mkmcconn/sig
User:Neutrality/Vandal
User:Neutrality/Welcome
User:Plato/Welcome
User:Raul654/License
User:Raul654/archive
User:Redwolf24/Welcome
User:Scott Burley/sig
User:Silsor/Sam Hocevar
User:Snoyes/boiler
User:TShilo12/Welcome
User:Taxman/Copyrights
User:Thorpe/signature
- user is done with this, doesn't intend to edit and it's widely transcluded.
User:Cool Cat/Vandalismcounter
User:Trödel/sig
- At user request; not in current use, concerned about possible vandalism in regards to transclusions. Please contact me on my talk or via email before unprotecting.
User:BD2412/Status
- used for personal reasons; heading off great potential for mischief
User talk pages: Registered users
User talk pages should only be protected in cases of persistent
vandalism
, and then only for as brief a period as possible. Please use the template
{{
Usertalk-sprotect
}} to mark such pages. This adds the page to
Category:Semi-protected user and user talk pages
ފަންވަތް:Article
temp. protected so that user can cool down and refrain adding further personal attacks. --
Madchester
18:32, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
blocked for one hour; personal attacks continue on the talk page, now protected. Someone else should look into it and implement unprotetion whenever they see fit.
El_C
01:47, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
user blocked for a week for personal attacks, continued on his Talk page, so protection applied. To be removed at end of block.
Matt
Crypto
16:24, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
. User banned by arbcom for a year, but exploits the mediawiki 1.5 misfeature to converse with sockpuppets.
Thrydulf
21:59, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- protected from the potential vandalism that the return of Wik/Gzornenplatz would almost certainly bring out. -
Lucky 6.9
05:04, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
The user has been banned for one year, but due to the block function's design he is still able to edit his talk page, which he blanked. To my knowledge, banning does not allow for any editing whatsoever, so there is no lgetimate reason for
User:Skyring
to edit the page. -
Willmcw
00:16, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
If you know who Tern is, you know why its protected.
dwolf24
talk
) 23:23, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
perm banned user for various offenses ranging from posting a list of Jewish wikipedians to posting instructions on how to best disrupt wikipedia using open proxies.
Jtkiefer
----- 20:29, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
Banned user MilkMan posting too many personal attacks on the user talk page.
Zzyzx11
(Talk)
01:04, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
Banned by the ArbCom for one year for leagal treates, continued vandalism and legal threats as an IP on page.--
nixie
01:38, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- user has been permanently blocked from editing and their user talk page has become a gamut of threats against other users: have protected to stop others appearing. --
Francs
2000
00:36, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- indefinitely blocked sock puppet of
user:Zephram Stark
; was using his talk page after the block to continue stirring up trouble.
SlimVirgin
(talk)
00:02, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- using talk page after indefinite block for rantings and personal attacks.
Jtkiefer
----- 18:43, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- indefinite blocked user, continuously ranting about the system and the admins.
Jtkiefer
----- 20:26, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
Indefinitely blocked troll (banned by admin consensus) who recently edited his own talk page in order to create the impression that he's still active. --
MarkSweep
07:59, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- legal threats (IP is blocked). --
fvw
19:56, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- getting indefinitely blocked didn't appear to phase this user who just carried on regardless on their talk page --
Francs
2000
13:52, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
Anonymous IP repeatedly blanking page to remove warnings and notices from administrators.
TenOfAllTrades
talk
) 14:27, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
is the talk page of a permanently banned user who seems to still be able to edit the page and make threats. Not any more. Back to the wiki-vacation. -
Lucky 6.9
20:58, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
- blocked enviroknot sockpuppet posting rants and flames.
Charles
P.
(Mirv)
23:05, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
permablocked impostor keeps changing this page into a redir.
Owen
00:24, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
Was warned repeatedly not to blank talk page, but continued to do so. --
Shanel
02:32, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
blocked user continues offensive remarks on Talk page.
Owen
23:05, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
The
North Carolina vandal
, after his IP range (63.19.128.0/17) was shut down, changing the various warning notices to abusive this-and-that. Can be unprotected shortly since the range block will expire later tonight.
Antandrus
(talk)
03:50, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
is semiprotected because of an anon AOL ip vandal. The 15 minute blocks AOL's get doesn't seem to be discouraging the vandalism (nor did a 45) so trying this instead. Lifted protection from the talk page so test the waters. --
Syrthiss
19:05, 30 January 2006 (UTC) (updated, page has been protected since Jan 6th)
ފަންވަތް:Article
is semiprotected for repeated removal/replacement by profanities of warnings and block notices. User indefinitely blocked by
Curps
for vandalism, and for 2 hours by
Lupin
. --
Arwel
talk
) 23:30, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
User_talk:Nicodemus75
- blocked user using his talk page for vicious personal attacks.
Dmcdevit
19:43, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
User_talk:Beckjord
being used to continue to edit despite his one year arbcom ban.
Dmcdevit
23:04, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
User talk:Zen-master
being used to continue to edit despite his one year arbcom ban.
Dmcdevit
23:04, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
User talk:SPUI
. User was give a short ban by arbitration committee for putting an unsuitable userbox on his userpage. During the ban, he has placed a copy of it on his talk page. This has been reverted and the page has been protected under a vprotect template. --
Tony Sidaway
23:22, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
User talk:Dschor
, banned, as with the others.
Dmcdevit
07:06, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
User talk:Braaad
, blocked indefinitely but still spewing hate on his talk page. —
Guan
aco
18:29, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Vandal
Sockpuppet of
User:Braaad
, blocked indefinitely but soapboxing on page -- initially feigning ignorance but since then has unambiguously demonstrated sock puppetry. --
Nlu
talk
) 19:09, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Vandal
Persistent vandal regarding the unsafe time travel nonsense, blanking and leaving abusive messages on his talk page; by request.
Antandrus
(talk)
23:03, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
Attack by open proxies. Likely to be sock puppets of blocked user
User:VinnyCee
. --
Nlu
talk
) 09:32, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Article
Attack by open proxies. Believed to be a sock of
User:VinnyCee
, --
LBMixPro
Sp
ak|on|it!
10:25, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
User talk pages: Anonymous users
Talk pages of anonymous users should generally only be semi-protected. This prevents a vandal from blanking warnings etc., but still allows non-admin RC patrollers to issue warnings on this page. Please use the template
{{
Usertalk-sprotect
}} to mark such pages. This adds the page to
Category:Semi-protected user and user talk pages
Please use the
{{
vandal
}} tag (replacing " " with "_" as appropriate).
ފަންވަތް:Vandal
- Offensive, threatening behaviour on talk page. Most recent edits are just a small example of previous behaviour - the most recent was reverted and I don't like to repeat what it said. --
Francs
2000
22:22, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
(semi-protected)
Block expires 2 October 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Vandal
Semi protected due to vandalism by blocked anon.
[[Sam Korn]]
13:45, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Vandal
Offensive changing of warning messages, even after being blocked. Semiprotected. --
BorgQueen
06:48, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Vandal
Blocked this school ip for 36 hours yeserday and semi-protected talk page after persistent blanking. The IP has a (lengthy) history of this.
SoLando
Talk
) 09:28, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Vandal
Full protection. User is blocked one month.
CambridgeBayWeather
(Talk)
07:30, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Vandal
Vandal blocked until February 27 is blanking talk page.
CambridgeBayWeather
(Talk)
00:46, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Vandal
- keeps blanking and putting pictures on his talk page, thus removing warnings. --
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
14:29, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Vandal
Soapboxing. Should be unprotected 14 Mar 2006, when block expires. --
Nlu
talk
) 04:40, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Vandal
Soapboxing. Should be unprotected 8 Aug 2006, when block expires. --
Nlu
talk
) 06:26, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Vandal
Vandalsim. Should be unprotected 36 hours from this posting when the block expires. --
LBMixPro
Sp
ak|on|it!
07:36, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
ފަންވަތް:Vandal
Soapboxing. Should be unprotected 1 Mar 2006, when block expires. --
Nlu
talk
) 16:28, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
އިން
ޤިސްމުތައް
Wikipedia shortcut box first parameter needs fixing
Protected
Wikipedia vandalism
ވިކިޕީޑިއާ
Protected page
ޚިޔާލެއް އިތުރުކުރައްވާ