…derived from Erik Nordmark's "Stateless IP/ICMP Translation Algorithm (SIIT)" [ RFC2765 ], which provides stateless translation between IPv4 [ RFC0791 ] and IPv6 [ RFC2460 ], and between ICMPv4 [ RFC0792 ] and ICMPv6 [ RFC4443 ]. This document obsoletes RFC 2765 [ RFC2765 ]. The …
…ugh the use of a well-known prefix. Such prefixes are defined in [RFC4291] and [RFC2765] at the time of this writing. If it is known by some external method that a given prefix is used to embed IPv4, it MAY be represented as mixed notation. Tools that provide options to specify p…
…the update to the Stateless IP/ ICMP Translation Algorithm (SIIT) described in [RFC2765]. The algorithm translates between IPv4 and IPv6 packet headers (including ICMP headers). The IP and ICMP translation document [RFC6145] discusses header translation for both stateless and sta…
… the use of a well-known prefix. Such prefixes are defined in [ RFC4291 ] and [ RFC2765 ] at the time of this writing. If it is known by some external method that a given prefix is used to embed IPv4, it MAY be represented as mixed notation. Tools that provide options to specify …
… the use of a well-known prefix. Such prefixes are defined in [ RFC4291 ] and [ RFC2765 ] at the time of this writing. If it is known by some external method that a given prefix is used to embed IPv4, it MAY be represented as mixed notation. Tools that provide options to specify …
… the use of a well-known prefix. Such prefixes are defined in [ RFC4291 ] and [ RFC2765 ] at the time of this writing. If it is known by some external method that a given prefix is used to embed IPv4, it MAY be represented as mixed notation. Tools that provide options to specify …
… the use of a well-known prefix. Such prefixes are defined in [ RFC4291 ] and [ RFC2765 ] at the time of this writing. If it is known by some external method that a given prefix is used to embed IPv4, it MAY be represented as mixed notation. Tools that provide options to specify …
…filer is correct. Although the intent might be clear from Section 4: " As with [RFC2765], the translating function specified in this document does not translate any IPv4 options, and it does not translate IPv6 extension headers except the Fragment Header." Although the Length por…
…filer is correct. Although the intent might be clear from Section 4: " As with [RFC2765], the translating function specified in this document does not translate any IPv4 options, and it does not translate IPv6 extension headers except the Fragment Header." Although the Length por…