…tics to the charset parameter of the application/xml media type as specified in RFC3023 ] or its successor. Encoding considerations: By virtue of EMMA content being XML, it has the same considerations when sent as " application/emma+xml "as does XML. See RFC 3023 (or its successo…

…osh file type The MIME type for SVG is " image/svg+xml " (see XML Media Types [ RFC3023 ]). The registration of this MIME type is in progress at the W3C. It is recommended that SVG files have the extension ".svg" (all lowercase) on all platforms. It is recommended that gzip-compr…

…rtunately, there is no consistent way to do this in the Web architecture (e.g., RFC3023 does not provide a means of specifying XML versions in media types). As a result, we urge the TAG and XML Co-ordination group to carefully consider what mechanisms are necessary to support XML…

… if the assigned media type has the suffix +xml (defined in "XML Media Types" [ RFC3023 ]), and the data format specification does not specify fragment identifier semantics. In short, just knowing that content is XML does not provide information about fragment identifier semantic…

… Elevated one statement to good practice note on character encoding; related to RFC3023 Deleted the definitions of terms backward/forward compatibility and extensible format specification. Added URI reference and base URI. Incorporated other editorial comments from Tim Bray Chang…

…presentation to be rejected by an architecturally sound client. Section 7.1 of [RFC3023] states: It isn't a perfectly usable representation. It is a configuration mismatch between the intended charset and the actual charset. This is no different from the error regarding mislabeli…

… if the assigned media type has the suffix +xml (defined in "XML Media Types" [ RFC3023 ]) as there is no normative specification of fragment semantics in this case. Many people assume that the fragment identifier #abc , when refering to XML data, identifies the element in the do…

…commendations, RFC 3023, DOM, and other relevant specifications. [XML] [XMLNS] [RFC3023] [DOM] The actual HTTP headers and other metadata, not the headers as mutated or implied by the algorithms given in this specification, are the ones that must be used when determining the char…

…f the assigned media type has the suffix "+xml" (defined in "XML Media Types" [ RFC3023 ]), and the data format specification does not specify fragment identifier semantics. In short, just knowing that content is XML does not provide information about fragment identifier semantic…

… is known to be XML because the media type has a suffix of +xml as described in RFC3023, but there is no normative specification of fragment semantics. It is common practice to assume that when an element has an attribute that is declared in a DTD to be of type ID, then the fragm…

…/xml , and any MIME type whose subtype ends with the four characters " +xml ". [RFC3023] 2.1.3 DOM trees The root element of a Document object is that Document 's first element child, if any. If it does not have one then the Document has no root element. The term root element , w…

… | application/link-format | - | 40 | [RFC6690] | | application/xml | - | 41 | [RFC3023] | | application/octet-stream | - | 42 | [RFC2045] [RFC2046] | | application/exi | - | 47 | [REC-exi-20140211] | | application/json | - | 50 | [RFC7159] | +--------------------------+---------…

… Elevated one statement to good practice note on character encoding; related to RFC3023 Deleted the definitions of terms backward/forward compatibility and extensible format specification. Added URI reference and base URI. Incorporated other editorial comments from Tim Bray Chang…

… de média assigné possède le suffixe "+xml" (défini dans "Types de média XML" [ RFC3023 ]). La spécification du format de données ne définit pas la sémantique des identifiants de fragment. En bref, le simple fait de savoir que le contenu est du XML ne fournit pas d'informations a…

…ettys, J. Mogul, H. Frystyk, L. Masinter, P. Leach, T. Berners-Lee, June 1999. [RFC3023] "XML Media Types," M. Murata, S. St. Laurent, D. Kohn, January 2001. [SMIL] "Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL) 1.0 Specification," P. Hoschka, ed., 15 June 1998. This W3C Re…