…tacks which employ IP Source Address Spoofing", BCP 38 , RFC 2827 , May 2000. [ RFC3484 ] Draves, R., "Default Address Selection for Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6)", RFC 3484 , February 2003. [ RFC3493 ] Gilligan, R., Thomson, S., Bound, J., McCann, J., and W. Stevens, "Basic…

…ers of anycast 6to4 are likely to be on hosts using the obsolete policy table [ RFC3484 ] (which prefers 6to4 above IPv4) and running without Happy Eyeballs. Furthermore, they must have a route to an operational anycast relay and they must be accessing an IPv6 host that has a rou…

…the revision of the Default Address Selection for Internet Protocol version 6 [ RFC3484 ], the revision of the Basic Socket Interface Extensions for IPv6 [ RFC3493 ], and from the revision of the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Addressing Architecture [ RFC3513 ]. Incidental r…

…tacks which employ IP Source Address Spoofing", BCP 38 , RFC 2827 , May 2000. [ RFC3484 ] Draves, R., "Default Address Selection for Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6)", RFC 3484 , February 2003. [ RFC3493 ] Gilligan, R., Thomson, S., Bound, J., McCann, J., and W. Stevens, "Basic…

…nslator. This can be caused by the host's default address selection algorithm [ RFC3484 ], referrals, or other reasons. Optimizing these scenarios for dual-stack hosts is for future study. 1.1 . Applicability Scope This document is part of a series defining address translation se…

…o be used by other standards documents, for example, Default Address Selection [RFC3484]. It should say: [RFC2462] introduces the concept of Tentative (in 5.4) and Deprecated | (in 5.5.4) addresses. Addresses that are neither Tentative nor Deprecated are said to be Preferred. Ten…

…o be used by other standards documents, for example, Default Address Selection [RFC3484]. It should say: [RFC2462] introduces the concept of Tentative (in 5.4) and Deprecated | (in 5.5.4) addresses. Addresses that are neither Tentative nor Deprecated are said to be Preferred. Ten…