…dual- stack hosts, and for this reason it deprecates RFC 4091 [ RFC4091 ] and [ RFC4092 ]. 2 . Overview of ICE In a typical ICE deployment, we have two endpoints (known as AGENTS in RFC 3264 terminology) that want to communicate. They are able to communicate indirectly via some s…
…dual- stack hosts, and for this reason it deprecates RFC 4091 [ RFC4091 ] and [ RFC4092 ]. 2 . Overview of ICE In a typical ICE deployment, we have two endpoints (known as AGENTS in RFC 3264 terminology) that want to communicate. They are able to communicate indirectly via some s…
…recated the solutions previously defined in RFC 4091 [ RFC4091 ] and RFC 4092 [ RFC4092 ]. Appendix B provides background information and motivations regarding the design decisions that were made when designing ICE. Keranen, et al. Standards Track [Page 6] RFC 8445 ICE July 2018 …
…dual- stack hosts, and for this reason it deprecates RFC 4091 [ RFC4091 ] and [ RFC4092 ]. 2 . Overview of ICE In a typical ICE deployment, we have two endpoints (known as AGENTS in RFC 3264 terminology) that want to communicate. They are able to communicate indirectly via some s…
…dual- stack hosts, and for this reason it deprecates RFC 4091 [ RFC4091 ] and [ RFC4092 ]. 2 . Overview of ICE In a typical ICE deployment, we have two endpoints (known as AGENTS in RFC 3264 terminology) that want to communicate. They are able to communicate indirectly via some s…
…recated the solutions previously defined in RFC 4091 [ RFC4091 ] and RFC 4092 [ RFC4092 ]. Appendix B provides background information and motivations regarding the design decisions that were made when designing ICE. Keranen, et al. Standards Track [Page 6] RFC 8445 ICE July 2018 …