…edSecret) STUN methods in the range 0x000 - 0x7FF are assigned by IETF Review [ RFC5226 ]. STUN methods in the range 0x800 - 0xFFF are assigned by Designated Expert [ RFC5226 ]. The responsibility of the expert is to verify that the selected codepoint(s) are not in use and that t…
…edSecret) STUN methods in the range 0x000 - 0x7FF are assigned by IETF Review [ RFC5226 ]. STUN methods in the range 0x800 - 0xFFF are assigned by Designated Expert [ RFC5226 ]. The responsibility of the expert is to verify that the selected codepoint(s) are not in use and that t…
…are IANA-assigned Section 9.1 ) via the Standards Action method as described in RFC5226 ]. 6.2.3 . TIMESTAMP The TIMESTAMP field is a formalized timestamp derived from [ RFC3339 ]. Whereas [ RFC3339 ] makes allowances for multiple syntaxes, this document imposes further restricti…
…lated organization using the "Specification Required" IANA registration policy [RFC5226] (which implies Expert Review). The first procedure is used for registrations from IETF Consensus documents, or in rare cases when registering a grandfathered (see Appendix A) and/or otherwise…
…ed property value is to be calculated in cooperation with a designated expert [ RFC5226 ] according to the rules specified under Sections 8 and 9 . The IESG is to be notified if backward-incompatible changes to the table of derived properties are discovered or if other problems a…
…ows the practice of Security Consideration sections within IANA registrations [ RFC5226 ]. In particular, Section 7 of RFC 3986 RFC3986 ] describes general security considerations for URIs while [ RFC3987 ] gives those for IRIs. The definition of an individual scheme should note …
…ecification text Values to be added to this namespace require IETF Review (see [RFC5226] Section 4.1 ). 7.1.2. Considerations for New Cache Control Directives New extension directives ought to consider defining: What it means for a directive to be specified multiple times, When t…
…ows the practice of Security Consideration sections within IANA registrations [ RFC5226 ]. In particular, Section 7 of RFC 3986 RFC3986 ] describes general security considerations for URIs while [ RFC3987 ] gives those for IRIs. The definition of an individual scheme should note …
… The TZ coordinator is an IANA Designated Expert, as defined in Section 3.2 of [RFC5226] Roughly speaking, this means that the IESG will choose one or more experts to manage the TZ database, code, and mailing list. TZ mailing list: The forum where matters relating to the TZ datab…
…es. The "HTTP/2.0 Frame Type" registry operates under the "IETF Review" policy [RFC5226] Frame types are an 8-bit value. When reviewing new frame type registrations, special attention is advised for any frame type-specific flags that are defined. Frame flags can interact with exi…
…Identification (FID). Semantics extensions follow the Standards Action policy [ RFC5226 ]. 6 . Use of "group" and "mid" All of the "m" lines of a session description that uses "group" MUST be identified with a "mid" attribute whether they appear in the group line(s) or not. If a …
…Identification (FID). Semantics extensions follow the Standards Action policy [ RFC5226 ]. 6 . Use of "group" and "mid" All of the "m" lines of a session description that uses "group" MUST be identified with a "mid" attribute whether they appear in the group line(s) or not. If a …
…ESG or their delegate), with a Specification Required (using terminology from [ RFC5226 ]). The requirements for registered relation types are described in Section 4.1 . Registration requests consist of the completed registration template below, typically published in an RFC or O…
…Identification (FID). Semantics extensions follow the Standards Action policy [ RFC5226 ]. 6 . Use of "group" and "mid" All of the "m" lines of a session description that uses "group" MUST be identified with a "mid" attribute whether they appear in the group line(s) or not. If a …
…IESG or their delegate), with a Specification Required (using terminology from [RFC5226]). The requirements for registered relation types are described in Section 4.1. Registration requests consist of the completed registration template below, typically published in an RFC or Ope…