…nsent MUST use a new STUN transaction identifier, as described in Section 6 of [RFC5389] . Each STUN binding request for consent is transmitted once only. A sender therefore cannot assume that it will receive a response for every consent request, and a response might be for a pre…

…-peer connectivity checks based on Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) [ RFC5389 ]. However, ICE only defines procedures for UDP-based transport protocols. There are many reasons why ICE support for TCP is important. First, there are media protocols that only run over TCP.…

…-peer connectivity checks based on Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) [ RFC5389 ]. However, ICE only defines procedures for UDP-based transport protocols. There are many reasons why ICE support for TCP is important. First, there are media protocols that only run over TCP.…

…nsent MUST use a new STUN transaction identifier, as described in Section 6 of [RFC5389] . Each STUN binding request for consent is transmitted once only. A sender therefore cannot assume that it will receive a response for every consent request, and a response might be for a pre…

…edential is a long-term authentication username and password, as described in [ RFC5389 ], Section 10.2. oauth An OAuth 2.0 based authentication method, as described in [ RFC7635 ]. It uses the OAuth 2.0 Implicit Grant type, with PoP (Proof-of-Possession) Token type, as described…

…edential is a long-term authentication username and password, as described in [ RFC5389 ], Section 10.2. 4.2.3 RTCIceServer Dictionary The RTCIceServer dictionary is used to describe the STUN and TURN servers that can be used by the ICE Agent to establish a connection with a peer…

…r. credential represents a long-term authentication password, as described in [ RFC5389 ], Section 10.2. An example array of RTCIceServer objects is: Example 1 [ { urls : 'stun:stun1.example.net' }, { urls : [ 'turns:turn.example.org' , 'turn:turn.example.net' ], username : 'user…

…addresses using techniques such as Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) [ RFC5389 ] and Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) [ RFC5766 ] and then checks the connectivity of each local-address-remote-address pair in order to select the best one. The addresses that are co…

…sirable. It is not compatible with Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) [ RFC5389 ] in the deployments involving multiple stateful translators, each one having a different pool of IPv4 addresses. STUN compatibility would only be achieved if the translators managed the same …

…nsmission timeout (RTO) and Rc, this amounts to 39.5 seconds, as explained in [ RFC5389 ], Section 7.2.1 . This timeout value is chosen to roughly coincide with the maximum possible duration of ICE connectivity checks from the remote peer, which, if successful, could create peer-…

…r. credential represents a long-term authentication password, as described in [ RFC5389 ], Section 10.2. An example array of RTCIceServer objects is: Example 1 [ { urls : 'stun:stun1.example.net' }, { urls : [ 'turns:turn.example.org' , 'turn:turn.example.net' ], username : 'user…

…ng often involves querying Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) servers [ RFC5389 ] and allocating relayed candidates on Traversal Using Relay NAT (TURN) servers [ RFC5766 ] . Although many ICE procedures can be completed in parallel, the pacing requirements from [ RFC8445 …

…ng often involves querying Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) servers [ RFC5389 ] and allocating relayed candidates on Traversal Using Relay NAT (TURN) servers [ RFC5766 ] . Although many ICE procedures can be completed in parallel, the pacing requirements from [ RFC8445 …

…r. credential represents a long-term authentication password, as described in [ RFC5389 ], Section 10.2. An example array of RTCIceServer objects is: Example urls 'stun:stun1.example.net' }, urls : [ 'turns:turn.example.org' 'turn:turn.example.net' ], username 'user' credential '…

…sirable. It is not compatible with Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) [ RFC5389 ] in the deployments involving multiple stateful translators, each one having a different pool of IPv4 addresses. STUN compatibility would only be achieved if the translators managed the same …