විකිපීඩියා:Sockpuppet investigations - විකිපීඩියා
Jump to content
විකිපීඩියා වෙතින්
"WP:SI" මෙතැනට යළියොමුවෙයි. the set index guideline සඳහා,
WP:SETINDEX
බලන්න.
To request CheckUser in a case that does
not
involve sockpuppetry, please scroll down to
Quick CheckUser requests
මෙම පිටුව ඉංග්‍රීසි ව්‍යාපෘතියෙන් මෙහි ගෙනවිත් ඇත. අන්තර්ගතය අපගේ ව්‍යාපෘතිය සමඟ 100% නොගැලපෙනමුත් අපගේ අවශ්‍යතාවයන් වලට අනුකූලව ගොඩනගා ගැනීම සඳහා මූලික පියවර ලෙස භාවිතා කළ හැකිය.
Page for requesting investigations of sockpuppetry
සැකිල්ල:SHORTDESC:Page for requesting investigations of sockpuppetry
Administrator instructions
කෙටි මං
WP:SPI
WP:RfCU
If you suspect sockpuppetry by an
administrator
, you should
email the Arbitration Committee
to open an investigation. If you need to submit off-wiki evidence for some other reason, you must
contact the checkuser team privately
to open an investigation. Private information, emails, logs, and other sensitive evidence must
not
be posted on Wikipedia. All evidence related to a sockpuppet investigation must otherwise be posted on the designated page.
What is a sockpuppet?
What happens in an SPI?
Sockpuppet investigations
Current cases
Sockpuppetry policy
Information pages
Guide to filing cases
Administrator instructions
Signs of sockpuppetry
SPI clerk pages
List of clerks
Noticeboard
(ලේඛනාගාරයක් තවම නැත. (
තනන්න
))
Procedures
IRC
#wikipedia-en-spi
connect
#wikipedia-en-spi-clerks
connect
SPI archives
Malformed cases
whitelist
This page is for requesting that we investigate whether two or more Wikipedia accounts are being
abusively operated by the same person
Before opening an investigation, you need good reason to suspect sockpuppetry.
Evidence is required.
When you open the investigation, you must immediately provide evidence that the suspected sock puppets are connected. The evidence will need to include
diffs
of edits that suggest the accounts are connected. (This requirement is waived if the edits in question are deleted; in this case just provide the names of the pages that the accounts have been editing.)
You must provide this evidence in a clear way.
Vaguely worded submissions will not be investigated. You need to actually show why your suspicion that the accounts are connected is reasonable.
Concision is key.
Evidence should be presented in a concise format. Because of the length of the backlog, cases with clear and concise explanations and evidence are handled the most quickly.
Investigations are conducted by a
clerk
or an
administrator
, who will compare the accounts' behaviour and determine whether they are probably connected. Upon request, investigations can also be conducted by a
checkuser
, who can look at technical data behind the accounts in order to determine how likely it is they are connected. CheckUser results are often called
technical evidence
, in contrast to publicly available
behavioural evidence
Due to Wikipedia's
CheckUser policy
, checkusers will conduct a technical investigation only if clear, behavioural evidence of sockpuppetry is also submitted; if you ask for technical evidence to be looked at but do not provide behavioural evidence, the investigation may not be allowed to proceed.
Additionally, checkusers will not publicly connect an account with an IP address per the
except in extremely rare circumstances.
How to open an investigation:
To add to an existing investigation (or
case
), enter the case name in the box below. To create a new investigation, enter the username of the oldest-created registered account (the "sockmaster")—or, if only IP addresses are involved, the IP that made the first relevant edit. Then click "Submit".
Note
: Do not include "User:" or any other commentary.
For example, if a prior filing was at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/John Doe
, or this is a first filing and the oldest registered account is
User:John Doe
, you should enter
John Doe
in the box below.
You will then be taken to another page containing a form you must complete to open the investigation. The process for opening a subsequent investigation on the same user is the same as for creating a new case. Again, do not include "User:" in any of the numbered fields.
If you also wish a checkuser to investigate, change
|checkuser=no
to
|checkuser=yes
in the edit box on the next page and explain why you are requesting it.
Note:
You can also open an investigation using
Twinkle
. After installing Twinkle, an "ARV" option will appear in the "TW" tab on any user, user talk, or user contributions page. Clicking on this option and selecting either "Sockpuppeteer" or "Sockpuppet" will allow you to fill in a few simple fields to file a report. The report will be automatically formatted for you.
If you are not
autoconfirmed
, and the case page is protected or does not exist, please click "show" to the right and use the box below.
Cases currently listed at SPI
මෙම පිටුව මෑතකදී වෙනස් කර ඇත්නම්, එය නවතම වෙනස්කම් පිළිබිඹු නොකිරීමට ඉඩ ඇත.
නවතම අනුවාදය ලබාගැනීම සඳහා
මෙම පිටුව විරේචනය කරන්න
Investigation
Status
Filed at (UTC)
Last user edit
Last clerk/CU edit
User
Time (UTC)
User
Time (UTC)
Quick CheckUser requests
සංස්කරණය
Use this section to request checkuser information relating to a situation that
does not involve sock puppetry
. You could use this section to request, for example:
Underlying IPs
of an account, where the autoblock has expired or been ineffective.
Collateral damage checks
for the informed hardblocking of IPs or ranges.
IP block exemption checks
before granting
IPBE
(or to verify it is being used constructively).
For threats of harm (to self or others)
you must email emergency
wikimedia.org (see the
threats of harm page
) and not use this page. Requests to investigate and confirm sockpuppetry should be listed in the sockpuppet section above, and not here (such requests will be summarily removed).
To make a request here, copy the following template and paste it to the end of this section (
quick link to edit
) – replacing "header" with an informative title, and adding underneath the template any relevant information – then sign using "~~~~", preview, and click "save".
==== HEADER ====
{{SPIquick}}
* {{Checkuser|
username
}}
Navboxes
සංස්කරණය
දැන්වීම්පුවරු (Noticeboards)
Wikipedia's centralized
discussion, request, and help venues
. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the
dashboard
සාමාන්‍ය
පරිපාලක
ප්‍රධාන
සිදුවීම්
closure
රොබෝවරු
Bureaucrats
Centralized discussion
Education
Interface admins
Main Page errors
Open proxies
OTRS
Oversight
User permissions
ලිපි සහ අන්තර්ගතය
ජීවත්වන පුද්ගලයන්ගේ චරිතාපදාන (BLP)
Copyrights
questions on media
problems
Current events
Dispute resolution
External links
Fringe theories
Neutral point of view
Original research
Reliable sources
Resource requests
Spam
blacklist
whitelist
Scalable vector graphics
Titleblacklist
Translation
පිටු
History merges
Mergers
Splits
Moves
Protection
Importation
XfD
Articles
Redirects
Categories
Templates
Files
Miscellany
Undeletion
පරිශීලක ගැටළු
Conflict of interest
Contributor copyright
Edit warring and 3RR
Sanctions
Personal restrictions
General sanctions
Sockpuppets
Usernames
Vandalism
වෙනත්
Arbitration
Committee noticeboard
requests
enforcement
Edit filters
requested
false positives
Questions
Editor assistance
Help desk
Teahouse
Reference desk
New articles
Requests for comment
කෝපි කඩේ
ප්‍රතිපත්ති
තාක්ෂණික
proposals
idea lab
WMF
miscellaneous
WikiProject proposals
ප්‍රවර්ගය:විකිපීඩියා දැන්වීම් පුවරු
" වෙතින් සම්ප්‍රවේශනය කෙරිණි
ප්‍රවර්ග
Wikipedia pages semi-protected from banned users
Wikipedia sockpuppetry
Non-talk pages with subpages that are automatically signed
සැඟවුණු ප්‍රවර්ග:
විකිපීඩියාවෙහි වැරදි ආරක්‍ෂිත සැකිලි අඩංගු පිටු
Wikipedia protected pages without expiry
ඉංග්‍රීසි ව්‍යාපෘතියේ සිට ආයාත කළ පිටු
විකිපීඩියා
Sockpuppet investigations
මාතෘකාවක් එක්කරන්න