1. Gilbert, J. A., Jansson, J. K. & Knight, R. The Earth Microbiome project: successes and aspirations. BMC Biol. 12, 69 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gevers, D. et al. The Human Microbiome Project: a community resource for the healthy human microbiome. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001377 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. iHMP Research Network Consortium. The Integrative Human Microbiome Project: dynamic analysis of microbiome-host omics profiles during periods of human health and disease. Cell Host Microbe 16, 276–289 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Marchesi, J. R. & Ravel, J. The vocabulary of microbiome research: a proposal. Microbiome 3, 31 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Gilbert, J. A. et al. Current understanding of the human microbiome. Nat. Med. 24, 392–400 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bolyen, E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Schloss, P. D. et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 7537–7541 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Edgar, R. C. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 10, 996–998 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Minot, S. S., Krumm, N. & Greenfield, N. B. One Codex: a sensitive and accurate data platform for genomic microbial identification. Preprint at bioRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/027607 (2015).

  11. Wood, D. E. & Salzberg, S. L. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol. 15, R46 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Segata, N. et al. Metagenomic microbial community profiling using unique clade-specific marker genes. Nat. Methods 9, 811–814 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gloor, G. B., Macklaim, J. M., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. & Egozcue, J. J. Microbiome datasets are compositional: and this is not optional. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2224 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8, e61217 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Dhariwal, A. et al. MicrobiomeAnalyst: a web-based tool for comprehensive statistical, visual and meta-analysis of microbiome data. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, W180–W188 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Chong, J. et al. MetaboAnalyst 4.0: towards more transparent and integrative metabolomics analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W486–W494 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chong, J., Yamamoto, M. & Xia, J. MetaboAnalystR 2.0: from raw spectra to biological insights. Metabolites 9, E57 (2019).

  18. Wilke, A. et al. The MG-RAST metagenomics database and portal in 2015. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D590–D594 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Huse, S. M. et al. VAMPS: a website for visualization and analysis of microbial population structures. BMC Bioinforma. 15, 41 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zakrzewski, M. et al. Calypso: a user-friendly web-server for mining and visualizing microbiome–environment interactions. Bioinformatics 33, (782–783 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Callahan, B. J., McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. P. Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis. ISME J. 11, 2639 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Baksi, K. D., Kuntal, B. K. & Mande, S. S. ‘TIME’: a web application for obtaining insights into microbial ecology using longitudinal microbiome data. Front. Microbiol. 9, 36 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Friedman, J. & Alm, E. J. Inferring correlation networks from genomic survey data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002687 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou, G. et al. NetworkAnalyst 3.0: a visual analytics platform for comprehensive gene expression profiling and meta-analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W234–W241 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Segata, N. et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 12, R60 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Langille, M. G. et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 814–821 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Aßhauer, K. P., Wemheuer, B., Daniel, R. & Meinicke, P. Tax4Fun: predicting functional profiles from metagenomic 16S rRNA data. Bioinformatics 31, 2882–2884 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Goeman, J. J., van de Geer, S. A., de Kort, F. & van Houwelingen, H. C. A global test for groups of genes: testing association with a clinical outcome. Bioinformatics 20, 93–99 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kanehisa, M., Goto, S., Sato, Y., Furumichi, M. & Tanabe, M. KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular data sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D109–114 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rocca, J. D. et al. The Microbiome Stress Project: toward a global meta-analysis of environmental stressors and their effects on microbial communities. Front. Microbiol. 9, 3272 (2018).

  32. Wirbel, J. et al. Meta-analysis of fecal metagenomes reveals global microbial signatures that are specific for colorectal cancer. Nat. Med 25, 679–689 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Sze, M. A. & Schloss, P. D. Looking for a signal in the noise: revisiting obesity and the Mmcrobiome. MBio 7, e01018-16 (2016).

  34. Gonzalez, A. et al. Qiita: rapid, web-enabled microbiome meta-analysis. Nat. Methods 15, 796–798 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ley, R. E., Lozupone, C. A., Hamady, M., Knight, R. & Gordon, J. I. Worlds within worlds: evolution of the vertebrate gut microbiota. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 776–788 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Lozupone, C. A. et al. Meta-analyses of studies of the human microbiota. Genome Res. 23, 1704–1714 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Xia, J. & Wishart, D. S. MSEA: a web-based tool to identify biologically meaningful patterns in quantitative metabolomic data. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, W71–W77 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Langille, M. G. et al. Microbial shifts in the aging mouse gut. Microbiome 2, 50 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Rousk, J. et al. Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. ISME J. 4, 1340–1351 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Foster, Z. S., Sharpton, T. J. & Grunwald, N. J. Metacoder: an R package for visualization and manipulation of community taxonomic diversity data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005404 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Gevers, D. et al. The treatment-naive microbiome in new-onset Crohn’s disease. Cell Host Microbe 15, 382–392 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Palmela, C. et al. Adherent-invasive Escherichia coli in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 67, 574–587 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Fang, X. et al. Escherichia coli B2 strains prevalent in inflammatory bowel disease patients have distinct metabolic capabilities that enable colonization of intestinal mucosa. BMC Syst. Biol. 12, 66 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Knights, D., Costello, E. K. & Knight, R. Supervised classification of human microbiota. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 35, 343–359 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhu, C. et al. Roseburia intestinalis inhibits interleukin−17 excretion and promotes regulatory T cells differentiation in colitis. Mol. Med. Rep. 17, 7567–7574 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Morgan, X. C. et al. Dysfunction of the intestinal microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease and treatment. Genome Biol. 13, R79 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Riviere, A., Selak, M., Lantin, D., Leroy, F. & De Vuyst, L. Bifidobacteria and butyrate-producing colon bacteria: importance and strategies for their stimulation in the human gut. Front. Microbiol. 7, 979 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. DeSantis, T. Z. et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 5069–5072 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Collins, A., Nolan, E., Hurley, M., D’Alton, A. & Hussey, S. Anorexia nervosa complicating pediatric Crohn disease—case report and literature review. Front. Pediatr. 6, 283 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Gerasimidis, K., McGrogan, P. & Edwards, C. A. The aetiology and impact of malnutrition in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 24, 313–326 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Pereira, M. B., Wallroth, M., Jonsson, V. & Kristiansson, E. Comparison of normalization methods for the analysis of metagenomic gene abundance data. BMC Genomics 19, 274 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Weiss, S. et al. Normalization and microbial differential abundance strategies depend upon data characteristics. Microbiome 5, 27 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. Waste not, want not: why rarefying microbiome data is inadmissible. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003531 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. McKnight, D. T. et al. Methods for normalizing microbiome data: an ecological perspective. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 389–400 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Dillies, M. A. et al. A comprehensive evaluation of normalization methods for Illumina high-throughput RNA sequencing data analysis. Brief. Bioinform. 14, 671–683 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hugerth, L. W. & Andersson, A. F. Analysing microbial community composition through amplicon sequencing: from sampling to hypothesis testing. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1561 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Bullard, J. H., Purdom, E., Hansen, K. D. & Dudoit, S. Evaluation of statistical methods for normalization and differential expression in mRNA-Seq experiments. BMC Bioinforma. 11, 94 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Joseph, N., Paulson, C., Corrada Bravo, H. & Pop, M. Robust methods for differential abundance analysis in marker gene surveys. Nat. Methods 10, 1200–1202 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Morgan, X. C. & Huttenhower, C. Chapter 12: human microbiome analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002808 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Ramette, A. Multivariate analyses in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 62, 142–160 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Kuczynski, J. et al. Microbial community resemblance methods differ in their ability to detect biologically relevant patterns. Nat. Methods 7, 813–819 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Anderson, M. J. & Walsh, D. C. PERMANOVA, ANOSIM, and the Mantel test in the face of heterogeneous dispersions: what null hypothesis are you testing? Ecol. Monog. 83, 557–574 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Anderson, M. J. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat07841(2014).

  65. Faust, K. et al. Microbial co-occurrence relationships in the human microbiome. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002606 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Layeghifard, M., Hwang, D. M. & Guttman, D. S. Disentangling interactions in the microbiome: a network perspective. Trends Microbiol. 25, 217–228 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Pearson, K. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution.—on a form of spurious correlation which may arise when indices are used in the measurement of organs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 60, 489–498 (1897).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Kurtz, Z. D. et al. Sparse and compositionally robust inference of microbial ecological networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004226 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Watts, S. C., Ritchie, S. C., Inouye, M. & Holt, K. E. FastSpar: rapid and scalable correlation estimation for compositional data. Bioinformatics 35, 1064–1066 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Touw, W. G. et al. Data mining in the life sciences with Random Forest: a walk in the park or lost in the jungle? Brief. Bioinform. 14, 315–326 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–596 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar