Why are we misdiagnosing urinary tract infection in older patients? A qualitative inquiry and roadmap for staff behaviour change

Why are we misdiagnosing urinary tract infection in older patients? A qualitative inquiry and roadmap for staff behaviour change in the emergency department | European Geriatric Medicine | Springer Nature Link
Advertisement
Why are we misdiagnosing urinary tract infection in older patients? A qualitative inquiry and roadmap for staff behaviour change in the emergency department
Research Paper
Published:
16 April 2019
Volume 10
, pages 585–593, (
2019
Cite this article
Save article
View saved research
European Geriatric Medicine
Aims and scope
Submit manuscript
Key summary points
AbstractSection
Aim
This study sough to determine the psychological and behavioural factors contributing to the incorrect diagnosis of urinary tract infection in older adults and identify potential interventions that can address the incorrect diagnosis of urinary tract infection in older adults?
AbstractSection
Findings
The findings were that the misdiagnosis of UTI, particularly in older people, is driven by complex, interconnected psychological and behavioural factors, such as lack of knowledge on the role of urine dip testing, bias towards older people, automatic testing, time and resource constraints, pressures from peers and patients and legal pressures. Developing interventions that address the disconnect between knowledge and practice by encompassing both psychological and behavioural factors may improve patient safety and staff satisfaction.
AbstractSection
Messages
Urine dipstick testing in the ED is often misinterpreted, leading to misdiagnosis which may then impact negatively on patient safety; the reasons this knowledge-practice disconnect exists are multi-factorial, but psychological and behavioural factors play a significant role. Systematic approaches incorporating these factors can potentially improve patient safety, efficiency, costs from unnecessary testing and staff satisfaction.
Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to identify the psychological and behavioural factors influencing clinicians managing older people with possible UTI in urgent care settings, and to develop an improvement roadmap.
Methods
Michie’s behaviour change wheel and COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour Change) models were used as the theoretical basis for this study. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 21 purposively selected medical and nursing staff in a large urban emergency department in the East Midlands, United Kingdom. Analysis was informed by the framework approach. A participatory design approach was used to develop an improvement roadmap.
Results
Key themes emerging from the semi-structured interviews included lack of knowledge on the role of urine dipstick testing, bias towards older people, automatic testing, time and resource constraints, pressures from peers and patients, and fear of the legal consequences of inaction. A thematic networks map indicated complex interactions between psychological and behavioural factors. Among more than 50 different intervention ideas identified by the workshop participants, two interventions were prioritised for implementation: i) controlling the use of dip stick urine tests; ii) providing individualised feedback to staff regarding the outcomes of patients diagnosed and treated for UTI.
Conclusions
Psychological and behavioural factors play a significant role in the misdiagnosis of UTI in older people. Systematic approaches incorporating these factors might improve patient outcomes. Future studies should focus on implementation and evaluating their effectiveness and sustainability.
This is a preview of subscription content,
log in via an institution
to check access.
Access this article
Log in via an institution
Subscribe and save
Springer+
from €37.37 /Month
Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
Cancel anytime
View plans
Buy Now
Price includes VAT (France)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Institutional subscriptions
Fig. 1
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Similar content being viewed by others
Gaps in communication between different staff groups and older adult patients foster unnecessary antibiotic prescribing for urinary tract infections in hospitals: a qualitative translation approach
Article
Open access
05 August 2019
Overprescribing antibiotics for asymptomatic bacteriuria in older adults: a case series review of admissions in two UK hospitals
Article
Open access
02 May 2019
Treatment of urinary tract infections in the old and fragile
Article
27 March 2020
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
Behavioral Methods
Behavioral Medicine
Geriatrics
Urinalysis
Urinary tract infection
Urology
Antimicrobial Stewardship in Long-Term Care Facilities
References
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Urinary tract infections in adults. London2015
SIGN. Management of suspected bacterial urinary tract infection in adults. A national clinical guideline. 2006
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Management of suspected bacterial urinary tract infection in adults. 2012
Nicolle LE, Gupta K, Bradley SF, Colgan R, DeMuri GP, Drekonja D et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria: 2019 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of Americaa. 2019.
Vanpee D, Swine C, Vandenbossche P, Gillet J (2001) Epidemiological profile of geriatric patients admitted to the emergency department of a university hospital localized in a rural area. European Journal of Emergency Medicine. 8(4):301–304
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Nemec M, Koller M, Nickel C (2010) Patients presenting to the emergency department with non-specific complaints: the Basel Non-specific Complaints (BANC) study. Acad Emerg Med 17(3):284–292.
Article
Google Scholar
Limpawattana P, Phungoen P, Mitsungnern T, Laosuangkoon W, Tansangworn N (2016) Atypical presentations of older adults at the emergency department and associated factors. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 62:97–102
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Eriksson I, Gustafson Y, Fagerstrom L, Olofsson B (2011) Urinary tract infection in very old women is associated with delirium. Int Psychogeriatr 23(3):496–502
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Manepalli J, Grossberg GT, Mueller C (1990) Prevalence of delirium and urinary tract infection in a psychogeriatric unit. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 3(4):198–202
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wojszel ZB, Toczyńska-Silkiewicz M (2018) Urinary tract infections in a geriatric sub-acute ward-health correlates and atypical presentations. European Geriatric Medicine. 9(5):659–667.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Nicolle LE, Bradley S, Colgan R, Rice JC, Schaeffer A, Hooton TM (2005) Infectious diseases society of America guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in adults. Clin Infect Dis 40(5):643–654.
Article
Google Scholar
Mody L, Juthani-Mehta M (2014) Urinary tract infections in older women: a clinical review. JAMA 311(8):844–854.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ninan S, Walton C, Barlow S. Investigation of suspected urinary tract infection in older people.. Britsh Medical Journal. 2014
Finucane TE (2017) “Urinary Tract Infection”—Requiem for a Heavyweight. J Am Geriatr Soc 65(8):1650–1655.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
O’Kelly K, Regen E, Phelps K, Kondova D, Conroy S (2016) Urinary tract infection – a qualitative study exploring the human factors contributing to misdiagnosis. European Geriatric Medicine. 7(1):s1–s282
Article
Google Scholar
Genao L, Buhr GT (2012) Urinary Tract Infections in Older Adults Residing in Long-Term Care Facilities. Ann Longterm Care. 20(4):33–38
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Nace DA, Drinka PJ, Crnich CJ (2014) Clinical uncertainties in the approach to long term care residents with possible urinary tract infection. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 15(2):133–139.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Beveridge LA, Davey PG, Phillips G, McMurdo MET (2011) Optimal management of urinary tract infections in older people. Clin Interv Aging 6:173–180.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Michie S, van Stralen M, West R (2011) The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science. 6(1):42
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gladman JRF, Conroy SP, Ranhoff AH, Gordon AL (2016) New horizons in the implementation and research of comprehensive geriatric assessment: knowing, doing and the ‘know-do’ gap. Age Ageing 45(2):194–200.
Article
Google Scholar
Ritchie J, Spencer L (1994) Analyzing qualitative data. In: Bryman A, Burgess R (eds) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. Routledge, London, pp 173–194
Google Scholar
Michie S, Atkins L, West R. The APEASE criteria for designing and evaluating interventions. The Behaviour Change Wheel: A Guide to Designing Interventions. London: Silverback Publishing; 2014
Fusch P, Ness L. Are We There Yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative Research2015
Misch F, Messmer AS, Nickel CH, Gujan M, Graber A, Blume K et al (2014) Impact of Observation on Disposition of Elderly Patients Presenting to Emergency Departments with Non-Specific Complaints. PLoS ONE 9(5):e98097.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Schmiemann G, Kniehl E, Gebhardt K, Matejczyk MM, Hummers-Pradier E (2010) The diagnosis of urinary tract infection: a systematic review. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 107(21):361–367.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Logan RL, Scott PJ (1996) Uncertainty in clinical practice: implications for quality and costs of health care. The Lancet. 347(9001):595–598.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Little P, Stuart B, Moore M, Coenen S, Butler CC, Godycki-Cwirko M et al (2013) Amoxicillin for acute lower-respiratory-tract infection in primary care when pneumonia is not suspected: a 12-country, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis 13(2):123–129.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Download references
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the staff (interviewees and stakeholders) who invested their time to discuss this issue, as well as to the follow colleagues who supported the project at various stages: Dr Natasha Lander, Dr Amelia Bull, Dr Kate Russ, Dr Emma Zain, Dr Muzamil Abbas, Dr Syed Babar.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Kate O’Kelly & Desislava Kondova
Department of Health Sciences, George Davies Centre, University of Leicester, Room 3.37, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
Kay Phelps, Emma L. Regen & Simon P. Conroy
Loughborough Design School, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
Fernando Carvalho, Val Mitchell & Gyuchan Thomas Jun
Authors
Kate O’Kelly
View author publications
Search author on:
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kay Phelps
View author publications
Search author on:
PubMed
Google Scholar
Emma L. Regen
View author publications
Search author on:
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fernando Carvalho
View author publications
Search author on:
PubMed
Google Scholar
Desislava Kondova
View author publications
Search author on:
PubMed
Google Scholar
Val Mitchell
View author publications
Search author on:
PubMed
Google Scholar
Simon P. Conroy
View author publications
Search author on:
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gyuchan Thomas Jun
View author publications
Search author on:
PubMed
Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence to
Simon P. Conroy
Ethics declarations
Funding
The project was funded by the British Geriatrics Society (BGS) via a Specialist Registrar Start-up Grant. Carvalho was funded by the Science without Borders programme (CNPq Brazil). The funders had no role in the study design, the conduct or the reporting.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical approval
The interview study did not require ethical approval (following discussion with the UK National Research Ethics Service)
but it was registered with the National Institute for Health Research Coordinated System for gaining NHS Permission (reference
183694). Ethical approval for the phase “Stakeholder workshops—intervention development” was obtained from Loughborough University.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
See Table
Table 3 Possible roadmap for improving UTI management in Emergency Departments
Full size table
Rights and permissions
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O’Kelly, K., Phelps, K., Regen, E.L.
et al.
Why are we misdiagnosing urinary tract infection in older patients? A qualitative inquiry and roadmap for staff behaviour change in the emergency department.
Eur Geriatr Med
10
, 585–593 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-019-00191-3
Download citation
Received
05 February 2019
Accepted
03 April 2019
Published
16 April 2019
Version of record
16 April 2019
Issue date
01 August 2019
DOI
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Keywords
Older people
Urinary tract infection
Qualitative research
Implementation
Access this article
Log in via an institution
Subscribe and save
Springer+
from €37.37 /Month
Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
Cancel anytime
View plans
Buy Now
Price includes VAT (France)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Institutional subscriptions
Advertisement