…nger exist. — Marco Aurelio 18:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC) On 10 August 2014, the Wikimedia Foundation added a " superprotect " right – granted to the "staff" global user group – which can make pages uneditable even for administrators, hence creating a new hierarchy where administr…

… and after this date. See current discussion . February Request bot flag for pl:Wikipedysta:Margosbot . Public anouncement: pl:Wikipedia:Bar#Status bota dla Wikipedysta:Margosbot . I'm inserting new interwiki links to articles. As for now I've put them into over 2000 articles (us…

Commons:Requests for comment/MP4 Video - Wikimedia Commons Jump to content From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository < Commons:Requests for comment Translate this page This discussion is now closed and archived. Please do not modify it. Closing with consensus prefer no MP…

Commons:Requests for comment/MP4 Video - Wikimedia Commons Jump to content From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository < Commons:Requests for comment Translate this page This discussion is now closed and archived. Please do not modify it. Closing with consensus prefer no MP…

…ink to a discussion here . Finally, there is a note about using deepcat at MediaWiki/CirrusSearch help page which links to a footnote about editing your Custom javascript . According to the activation instructions : To use [deepcat] on one of the other Wiki-projects each user has…

…n (talk) 19:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC) [ reply ] I gather you haven't seen Slate? Wikipedia Beats Major News Organizations, Perfectly Reflects Chelsea Manning’s New Gender L iz Let's Talk 20:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC) [ reply ] There is no conceivable reason for us to want to garner …

This is a project page to determine what action is required on the part of the Wikipedia community regarding the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and our response to it (if any). Jimmy Wales asked for community input on a possible database lock, similar to what the Italian Wikipedia…

…ch allows users to collaboratively edit and manage files on remote web servers. Wikipedia : "The WebDAV protocol allows 'Intercreativity,' making the Web a readable and writable medium, in line with Tim Berners-Lee's original vision.[1] It allows users to create, change and move …

…, ktp.re You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language Dear all, Thank you everyone for following the progress of the Universal Code of Conduct. I am writing to you today to announce the outcome of the ratifica…

…, ktp.re You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language Dear all, Thank you everyone for following the progress of the Universal Code of Conduct. I am writing to you today to announce the outcome of the ratifica…

…g the talk pages of drafts, so they get put in the various WP:AALERTS notice of Wikiprojects. It works pretty well at WP:JOURNALS and WP:WPWIR and other involved projects. Headbomb { t · c · p · b } 19:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC) I don't see what benefit the current use of draft s…

…p a page to organise how best to tackle improving the Penwith pages here , as a wikiproject - feel free to add your name to the list. there isn't much there yet as we haven't had much time to organise lists of things to do yet, but the idea is to write down a list of things that …

Since the 2013 RfC on Wikidata Phase 2 , using Wikidata in infoboxes has gone from the concept stage to more extensive mainspace experimental implementations. This had led to some controversies: some editors have been converting infoboxes to use Wikidata, believing use of Wikidat…

…aborate. — Justin ( ko a vf ) ❤ T ☮ C ☺ M ☯ 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…

…ely make anyone elaborate. — Justin ( ko vf 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…