This page is a policy on the Simple English Wikipedia. Many people agree with it. They see it as a standard idea that all users should normally follow. When changing this page (except for minor errors like typos), please check that other people agree with your changes. Use the ta…
Here are the winners! [ edit ] Winners announced for the Wiki Loves Safeguarding Living Heritage photo contest The European photo contest related to the campaign resulted in 1700 photos in Wikimedia Commons focusing on the various forms of safeguarding living heritage. The winner…
Wikipedia essay with advice on privacy Essay on editing Wikipedia For some editors of Wikipedia, having their "real life" identity discovered can be a major problem, threatening their well-being, careers, or even personal safety . There are a variety of steps you can take to help…
Wikiversity:Glossary - Wikiversity Jump to content From Wikiversity Shortcut WV:G This is a glossary of terms commonly used on Wikiversity . For more help, see Help:Contents Wikiversity:Questions , and Wikiversity:Help desk Contents: Top 0–9 edit source Administrator At Wikipedia…
…ty is blatantly bureaucratic and is definitely bad faith, and goes against what Wikipedia stands for. Community consensus should be the the final say on content, not an elected body that we have to hope are doing the right thing. Kirbanzo ( userpage - talk - contribs ) 14:23, 17 …
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2026-02-17/Disinformation report - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost 2026-02-17 Epstein's obsessions: The sex offender's attempts to whitewash Wikipedia run deeper than we first thought. ← Bac…
… ৱিকিপিডিয়ান . The prohibition against personal attacks applies equally to all Wikipedians. It is as unacceptable to attack a user with a history of foolish or boorish behavior, or even one who has been subject to action by the Arbitration Committee, as it is to attack any other…
…al ban. Participants agreed that the demonstrated behavior is not acceptable on Wikimedia projects or when directed at Wikimedia users on other platforms. However, there is no consensus to globally ban Faster than Thunder, given considerations such as their medical conditions, th…
Wikipedia policy This page in a nutshell: Problematic behaviour may lead to editing restrictions (partial or complete) to be applied to any editor, either by community consensus or by the Arbitration Committee. A ban is a formal prohibition from editing some or all pages on the E…
Wikipedia policy This page in a nutshell: Problematic behaviour may lead to editing restrictions (partial or complete) to be applied to any editor, either by community consensus or by the Arbitration Committee. A ban is a formal prohibition from editing some or all pages on the E…
This page is considered an official policy on Wikimedia Commons. It has wide acceptance among editors and is considered a standard that everyone must follow. Except for minor edits (such as fixing typos, or bringing information up to date), please make use of the discussion page …
This learning project can help you learn how to be a Wikimedia sysop (wiki administrator). The topic of "how to be a Wikimedia sysop" is one which engenders a great deal of emotion among some people, so please be patient while this project develops, or if you need to blow off ste…
This learning project can help you learn how to be a Wikimedia sysop (wiki administrator). The topic of "how to be a Wikimedia sysop" is one which engenders a great deal of emotion among some people, so please be patient while this project develops, or if you need to blow off ste…
…ly, copyright violation could be a possible reason because anyone can link to a Wiki history and if the wiki is being used to host seriously problematic material, such as codes to crack copyright protection, through a link to page history, it could be quite appropriate to revisio…
… this article was written in the authors' roles as academics and I do not think Wikipedia should be sanctioning an academic for writing in a reputable journal on a topic of their study. So we're left with a talk page rant that has been peer-reviewed in a reputable journal allegin…