…n (talk) 19:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC) [ reply ] I gather you haven't seen Slate? Wikipedia Beats Major News Organizations, Perfectly Reflects Chelsea Manning’s New Gender L iz Let's Talk 20:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC) [ reply ] There is no conceivable reason for us to want to garner …

…n one direction or another. Black Kite (talk) 21:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC) So Wikipedia should have religious tests for certain actions? And are you implying that leftists can't be religious? Besides being "not appropriate or relevant" as Mr Ernie said, I think it's more a viol…

… ( RFC on next steps), Summary of public discussions ( 2 online consultations , Wikimania workshop upcoming) Section in progress. This is a wiki, please edit to include links to any discussion that is not yet there. Editors spend a lot of time reading, writing, and reviewing mate…

Wikipedia:Editor's index to Wikipedia - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Community portal Dashboard Departments Maintenance Tasks Discord IRC Matrix.org Meetups Directories ( Protocols Essays How-to Index Noticeboards AI WikiProjects ) Shortcuts WP:…

…s and smokescreens by Slowking will never help their case. The abuse of certain wikis is extensive, and especially if you want to argue that a block should be void because every admin from 5 different wikis gave you an involved block, you can't particularly do that while creating…

Wikipedia:Glossary - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Help:Glossary ) Glossary of terms commonly used on Wikipedia Abbreviations Edit summaries Glossary HTML Shortcuts Templates Wikitext Directory Shortcuts WP:G WP:G WP:TERM WP:TERM…

Wikipedia:Glossary - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Glossary of terms commonly used on Wikipedia Abbreviations Edit summaries Glossary HTML Shortcuts Templates Wikitext Directory Shortcuts WP:G WP:G WP:TERM WP:TERM For abbreviations used in edit s…

On 10 June 2019, an English Wikipedia administrator was banned by the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) from editing the English Wikipedia for a period of 1 year. A large community discussion followed, which included various statements by stakeholders , including the Trust & Safety depa…

…is not easily understood by many readers. For an example, see [1] To say that a Wikimedia project has a "Systemic problem" is a fancy way of saying that an entire system has a problem. One could simply say: "Severe problems that affect an entire project" to describe the Big-Endia…

…majority of all active, unrecused arbitrators (same as the final decision). See Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures#Motions to dismiss . Template 1) {text of proposed motion} Support: Oppose: Abstain: Comments: Proposed final decision Purpose of Wikipedia 1) The purpose of…

…g the talk pages of drafts, so they get put in the various WP:AALERTS notice of Wikiprojects. It works pretty well at WP:JOURNALS and WP:WPWIR and other involved projects. Headbomb { t · c · p · b } 19:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC) I don't see what benefit the current use of draft s…

…p a page to organise how best to tackle improving the Penwith pages here , as a wikiproject - feel free to add your name to the list. there isn't much there yet as we haven't had much time to organise lists of things to do yet, but the idea is to write down a list of things that …

…s://voice.mozilla.org/en/datasets now released as CC0. Should we import this to wikimedia? Somehow related to this: We have many uploads of personal images which then are delete as being out of scope. Would they not be potentially useful for building a training dataset for faces?…

Wikimedia project page request for arbitration is the last step of dispute resolution for conduct disputes on Wikipedia. The Arbitration Committee considers requests to open new cases and review previous decisions. The entire process is governed by the arbitration policy . For in…

…early used the news article as source (2 years ago), yet you let them use it on Wikipedia. And when I fixed that That too from a source that's already on the website. Will you block me for that? What military edit did I make there? Even in the Vidyadhar section, I had only includ…