… like a bad idea, but actually seems like it could pose a fundamental threat to Wikipedia. If that sounds like an overreaction, let me explain. The point of this feature is that it would warn people when they're about to make a non-neutral edit. That sounds like a great idea in t…

…is not easily understood by many readers. For an example, see [1] To say that a Wikimedia project has a "Systemic problem" is a fancy way of saying that an entire system has a problem. One could simply say: "Severe problems that affect an entire project" to describe the Big-Endia…

User talk:AKlapper (WMF) - MediaWiki Jump to content From mediawiki.org Latest comment: 2 months ago by AKlapper (WMF) in topic TTO for Trusted-Contributors Please first read the " Contact me " section on User:AKlapper (WMF) before commenting here. This talk page might not be the…

…nger exist. — Marco Aurelio 18:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC) On 10 August 2014, the Wikimedia Foundation added a " superprotect " right – granted to the "staff" global user group – which can make pages uneditable even for administrators, hence creating a new hierarchy where administr…

WikiJournal User Group is a publishing group of open-access, free-to-publish, Wikipedia-integrated academic journals. <seo title=" WJM, WikiJMed, Wiki.J.Med., WikiJMed, Wikiversity Journal User Group, WikiJournal WikiMed, Free to publish, Open access, Open-access, Non-profit, onl…

…s and smokescreens by Slowking will never help their case. The abuse of certain wikis is extensive, and especially if you want to argue that a block should be void because every admin from 5 different wikis gave you an involved block, you can't particularly do that while creating…

…aborate. — Justin ( ko a vf ) ❤ T ☮ C ☺ M ☯ 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…

…ely make anyone elaborate. — Justin ( ko vf 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…

…n one direction or another. Black Kite (talk) 21:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC) So Wikipedia should have religious tests for certain actions? And are you implying that leftists can't be religious? Besides being "not appropriate or relevant" as Mr Ernie said, I think it's more a viol…

…nd any other measure that restricts or reduces the use of pending changes on en.wiki.— S Marshall T / C 20:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC) Support until a PC2 RFC passes by some miracle. — Gestrid ( talk ) 00:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC) Support . Not this shit again. You don't have conse…

…ion of their choice under § Other discussions . In the first phase, the English Wikipedia was registered as a single "participant group"; this is to be the same in Phase 2. About 100 editors participated in the local discussion , and more than 300 other editors participated elsew…

… "The free library" has achieved unusually strong across-the-board consensus at Wikisource, in all of its language versions. Take a look here and here . This was already discussed earlier on the template talk, and discussion was brief out of the simple realization that this is co…

…mance , please delete deasaich an tùs Sorry, i don't speak the language of this Wikipedia and could not find the Template for Deletion-Requests. However i would like to inform you that the Article The Flowers Of Romance is an hoax, see and commons:Commons:Village_pump#Hoax Articl…

…r-faith disruption from this single user ascends everything I have ever seen on Wikipedia entirely, so I am merely going to scratch the surface here. Make no mistake though; this disruption is blatant , systematic , and severe . Major recognition deserves to go to the team of edi…

…r-faith disruption from this single user ascends everything I have ever seen on Wikipedia entirely, so I am merely going to scratch the surface here. Make no mistake though; this disruption is blatant , systematic , and severe . Major recognition deserves to go to the team of edi…