…n one direction or another. Black Kite (talk) 21:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC) So Wikipedia should have religious tests for certain actions? And are you implying that leftists can't be religious? Besides being "not appropriate or relevant" as Mr Ernie said, I think it's more a viol…

… ( RFC on next steps), Summary of public discussions ( 2 online consultations , Wikimania workshop upcoming) Section in progress. This is a wiki, please edit to include links to any discussion that is not yet there. Editors spend a lot of time reading, writing, and reviewing mate…

…s and smokescreens by Slowking will never help their case. The abuse of certain wikis is extensive, and especially if you want to argue that a block should be void because every admin from 5 different wikis gave you an involved block, you can't particularly do that while creating…

This is a project page to determine what action is required on the part of the Wikipedia community regarding the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and our response to it (if any). Jimmy Wales asked for community input on a possible database lock, similar to what the Italian Wikipedia…

…scussion will be moved to the talk page. Background statement [ edit ] Does the Wikipedia community support the concept of date autoformatting? Scope Autoformatting is a way of marking up dates to allow registered users to choose their preferred display format. A variety of metho…

… topic was opened with the focus on the actions of mainly one user on the Scots Wikipedia. His actions, albeit well-intentioned, nonetheless exposed a large vulnerability not just in the Scots Wiki, but small language Wikis in general. The conversation that followed quickly turne…

On 10 June 2019, an English Wikipedia administrator was banned by the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) from editing the English Wikipedia for a period of 1 year. A large community discussion followed, which included various statements by stakeholders , including the Trust & Safety depa…

…, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs) . FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria . All editors are welcome to review nominations ; please see the review FAQ . Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedba…

…d article up to date. This is pure censorship . It is a sad day in history when wikipedia decides to change the rules of a wiki and only allow a select few to make changes. Sitedown ( talk ) 19:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ] I think that this only makes sense if we exclude …

…e Intercept dévoile la surveillance secrète et les tactiques de pression visant WikiLeaks et ses partisans, mis en place par la NSA et le GCHQ [ 244 ] , [ 245 ] . The Intercept indique également que la NSA s'est également intéressée au site de partage de fichiers The Pirate Bay a…

…g the talk pages of drafts, so they get put in the various WP:AALERTS notice of Wikiprojects. It works pretty well at WP:JOURNALS and WP:WPWIR and other involved projects. Headbomb { t · c · p · b } 19:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC) I don't see what benefit the current use of draft s…

…p a page to organise how best to tackle improving the Penwith pages here , as a wikiproject - feel free to add your name to the list. there isn't much there yet as we haven't had much time to organise lists of things to do yet, but the idea is to write down a list of things that …

…really SoP, but maybe the information belongs somewhere else? Maybe link to the Wikipedia article? Rl 12:11, 5 May 2011 (UTC) I don't think "on" is an antonym for "against". "For" is closer, but is not a real antonym, not being commonly used in the same way grammatically. We have…

…aborate. — Justin ( ko a vf ) ❤ T ☮ C ☺ M ☯ 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…

…ely make anyone elaborate. — Justin ( ko vf 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…