… stating that they did not find it acceptable for the Foundation to call itself Wikipedia At 24 minutes and 40 seconds in, during this Wikimedia Foundation branding proposal presentation of April 11, 2019 used as the basis for the community consultation, Zack McCune, User:ZMcCune…

…isambiguation pages for more popular names/topics take hours of combing through Wikipedia's search results and flipping back and forth among tabs to complete birth and death information. It feels pointless and it's tiring (anyone's who's done it would probably agree) and as a res…

Page for discussing Wikipedia technical issues The technical section of the village pump is used to discuss technical issues about Wikipedia . Bug reports and feature requests should be made in Phabricator (see how to report a bug ). Bugs with security implications should be repo…

…ng that. :) -- Varnent ( talk ) ( COI ) 03:28, 15 April 2015 (UTC) Reply Hi, on Wikimedia Foundation elections 2015/Call for candidates , in the FDC text, "content contributors" is mentioned twice: "(e.g. content contributors , program leaders, user group leaders, functionaries, …

…ng that. :) -- Varnent ( talk ) ( COI ) 03:28, 15 April 2015 (UTC) Reply Hi, on Wikimedia Foundation elections 2015/Call for candidates , in the FDC text, "content contributors" is mentioned twice: "(e.g. content contributors , program leaders, user group leaders, functionaries, …

…s and smokescreens by Slowking will never help their case. The abuse of certain wikis is extensive, and especially if you want to argue that a block should be void because every admin from 5 different wikis gave you an involved block, you can't particularly do that while creating…

Wikipedia information page Robots or bots are automatic processes that interact with Wikipedia (and other Wikimedia projects) as though they were human editors. This page attempts to explain how to carry out the development of a bot for use on Wikimedia projects and much of this …

Talk:HTTPS - Meta-Wiki Jump to content From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki Latest comment: 4 years ago by Wbm1058 in topic Bots Organisation of the content page edit Latest comment: 12 years ago 4 comments 3 people in discussion Here are the thoughts which drived my …

Since the 2013 RfC on Wikidata Phase 2 , using Wikidata in infoboxes has gone from the concept stage to more extensive mainspace experimental implementations. This had led to some controversies: some editors have been converting infoboxes to use Wikidata, believing use of Wikidat…

Leadership Development Working Group/Participate - Meta-Wiki Jump to content From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki Leadership Development Working Group Translate this page Other languages: Bahasa Indonesia dansk hrvatski italiano polski português do Brasil slovenščina …

Leadership Development Working Group/Participate - Meta-Wiki Jump to content From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki < Leadership Development Working Group Translate this page Other languages: Bahasa Indonesia Deutsch English dansk español français hrvatski italiano pols…

Leadership Development Working Group/Participate - Meta-Wiki Jump to content From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki < Leadership Development Working Group Translate this page Other languages: Bahasa Indonesia Deutsch English dansk español français hrvatski italiano pols…

…technical section of the village pump is used to discuss technical issues about Wikipedia . Bugs and feature requests should be made in Phabricator (see how to report a bug ). Bugs with security implications should be reported differently (see how to report security bugs ). Newco…

…ion of their choice under § Other discussions . In the first phase, the English Wikipedia was registered as a single "participant group"; this is to be the same in Phase 2. About 100 editors participated in the local discussion , and more than 300 other editors participated elsew…

A 2008 study found that Wikipedians were less agreeable, open, and conscientious than others… We seem plenty conscientious—otherwise why would we be here? :?) And I feel it's important to be "open" to being wrong (as long as it's verifiable). But why would anyone expect a good ed…