Wikipedia:Requests for deletion - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia:Requests for deletion - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to content
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shortcuts
WP:AFD
WP:AFD
WP:RFD
WP:RFD
WP:XFD
WP:XFD
WP:VFD
WP:VFD
If you think a page should be deleted, read the
deletion policy
to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS
Before nominating: checks and alternatives
change source
Shortcut
WP:BEFORE
WP:BEFORE
Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:
A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
The
Wikipedia deletion policy
, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions:
notability
WP:N
),
verifiability
WP:V
),
reliable sources
WP:RS
), and
what Wikipedia is not
WP:NOT
Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at
Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
B. Carry out these checks
Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for
quick deletion
If there are
verifiability
notability
or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for
reliable sources
. (See step D.)
Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
Read the article's
talk page
for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
Check if there are
interlanguage
links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-
Latin alphabet
(such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.
C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as
notability
hoax
original research
, or
advert
; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or
redirecting
to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
The minimum search expected is a
normal Google search
, a
Google Books
search, a
Google News
search, and a
Google News
archive
search;
Google Scholar
is suggested for academic subjects.
If you find a
lack of sources
, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
If you find that adequate sources
do appear to exist
, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include
unreferenced
refimprove
third-party
primary sources
and
one source
Discussed deletion
change source
Put the deletion tag on the article.
Click "
Change source
" at the top of the page to be deleted.
In
the edit box
, add this tag:
rfd
|REASON
. Put it at the
top
of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the
discussion page
(see below).
It is a good idea to write a
change summary
to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
Click "
Save changes
" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your
watchlist
. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be
put back
Create a discussion page.
If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "
Click here to create a discussion page!
" Click that link.
You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added:
RfD/Preload/Template
. Replace the text
PLACE REASON HERE
with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
It is helpful to include links to the various
policy pages
about Wikipedia (that begin with
Wikipedia:
). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
Click "
Save changes
" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
Copy the title of the discussion page to the
clipboard
. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
Go to the
list of deletion requests
, and click "
change source
" beside the words "
Current deletion request discussions
".
At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a
template
that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
{{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2026/(name of page to be deleted)}}
Finally, click "
Save changes
" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!
If this is too complicated for you, there are some
gadgets
like
Twinkle
that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.
Quick deletion
change source
See also:
Wikipedia:Deletion policy §
Quick deletion
If you think a page has nonsense content, add
non
to the top of the page.
If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add
notable
to the top of the page.
If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add
QD
|reason
to the top of the page.
Notifying the user
change source
Generally, you should try to be
civil
and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding
{{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~
to the bottom of their talkpage.
Discussions
change source
See also:
Wikipedia:Deletion review
The discussion is
not
a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with
and sign after your comment by adding
~~~~
to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one
).
New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
Suggestions by users using "
sock puppets
" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
Please make
only one
suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put

before your old idea and

after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "
Delete
keep
".
If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an
administrator
Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as
delete and merge
Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click
here
for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.
Remember:
You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about
not
making a suggestion if:
A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
All
times are in
UTC
Current deletion request discussions
change source
Clemens Ruthner
change source
Clemens Ruthner
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
Garsh2
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Seemingly non-notable academic. Does not meet
WP:NPROF
or the
WP:GNG
Garsh
talk
03:49, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
03:49, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Beyond Sandbox
change source
Beyond Sandbox
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
Garsh2
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Seemingly non-notable game. The sources on the article are primary, and a search didn't reveal any others that show notability under the
WP:GNG
Garsh
talk
19:51, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
19:51, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Somaya Harun
change source
Somaya Harun
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
notability isn't established. Many of the sources focus on the winner of the Miss INternational and mention her just as the second runner up in passing. Other articles are press releases, interviews, or her name mentioned in a list.
CountryANDWestern
talk
12:24, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
12:24, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Kabra Altaf (2nd nomination)
change source
Kabra Altaf (2nd nomination)
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Notability isn't shown. The competitions won are minor/local and not significant championships. Second nomination as the first closed as a softdelete.
CountryANDWestern
talk
12:06, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
12:06, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Danish Manzoor
change source
Danish Manzoor
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Notability isn't established through reliable sources. A couple of these are interviews. Several are basically the same article. Almost all are written by "The news desk" type authors suggesting paid placement. The competition he received a bronze medal at is not a notable event; it may not even be verifiable. If you Google "Elite Cup International Taekwondo Championship", the results are exclusively articles about him.
CountryANDWestern
talk
12:05, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
12:05, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Clara Fountain
change source
Clara Fountain
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Notability not established. The only two sources are listings in databases.
CountryANDWestern
talk
11:59, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
11:59, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
John Guest
change source
John Guest
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Notability isn't established through significant coverage in independent sources. Many sources in here, but most are things he wrote, or things unrelated to him (why is the obit of a CEO necessary?). Nothing shown that demonstrates he is notable, even if proper sources were found.
CountryANDWestern
talk
13:03, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Hard edit undertaken this morning simpler with external sources apparent. Perhaps worthy of keeping.
Edgeofhistory
talk
20:26, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
Delete
, seems like some kind of self-promotion to me (
As an author, his philanthropic committed extends to open source publications and making his research books accessible online without charge
). Biographical facts are mostly unsourced, generally there are no reliable sources on the Internet for this man's biography.
BZPN
talk
20:34, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
I value the feedback from BZPN and CountryANDWestern. This is my first attempt at article creation, and I will strive to be more discerning. I also appreciate Edgeofhistory's thorough edits, which have made the article much clearer and more concise. I apologise if my choice of Guest for my first article attempt was inappropriate. He is among the top 1% of authors on Academia.edu in the specialised fields of genealogy and football research and I thought his research and books were deserving.
RSRV945
talk
22:56, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Delete
self-promo
🏹Nathan Veritas
22:58, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
I have undertaken and major re-write for the Guest article after visiting sites and reading the hard copies at the National Library in Canberra. I don't think the article should be deleted. His work and recognition also helps simple Wikipedia to address in a small way the underrepresented contributions by Australian's particularly in the 21st century work of genealogists and historians.
Taskhawk
talk
23:18, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
'''
Keep
'''
I like Taskhawk's re-write. Increasing contributions from Australia is something I would like to support. Alongside his genealogy efforts, his work on the history of football in Australia is significant, and I think it is essential to acknowledge the relevance of modern-day contributions like Guest's within the Australian context as well.
Edgeofhistory
talk
00:22, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Yes to
Edgeofhistory
talk
) comments. An yes,
Keep, but may need improvement/clean up."
Taskhawk
talk
00:30, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
“””
Keep
”””
I appreciate your efforts in improving and refining my initial draft. The edits additions, and removals made by
Edgeofhistory
talk
) and
Taskhawk
talk
) have significantly enhanced the article. I hope we can keep this revised version, or a further improvement thereof. I'll refrain from making an changes to the latest version and best left in the hands of those above. Thanks!
RSRV945
talk
01:07, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
This request is due to close on
13:03, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Global Communicorp UK
change source
Global Communicorp UK
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
Garsh2
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Not seeing any evidence of notability for this company. The article is also mostly promotional.
Garsh
talk
20:04, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
20:04, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Mary Ann Crowe
change source
Mary Ann Crowe
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Notability not shown or established. One source is her obituary in a local newspaper. The others are databases. Doesn't establish that she meets GNG.
CountryANDWestern
talk
13:33, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
13:33, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Maria Eufrosyne Andresson
change source
Maria Eufrosyne Andresson
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Notability not established. The news articles are a paragraph about her death and an article about her turning 100. Nothing significant otherwise.
CountryANDWestern
talk
12:55, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
12:55, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Anjar Wanto
change source
Anjar Wanto
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Notability not established by significant coverage in independent sources. The first two sources are his name or brief demographic type information in databases or rankings, the other three sources are his own works.
CountryANDWestern
talk
12:24, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
12:24, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Surat untuk Adriane
change source
Surat untuk Adriane
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
No notability for this book is shown. The two sources are its listing in a library catalog and an article from the "editor" of a news site about the book's release party. Neither establishes notability. The only other coverage I can find is
it listed among 230 books
that entered a competition.
CountryANDWestern
talk
12:08, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
12:08, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
EFFORT Trial
change source
EFFORT Trial
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
No notability for this clinical trial is shown through independent sources.
CountryANDWestern
talk
11:55, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
11:55, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Marco Scardeoni
change source
Marco Scardeoni
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Doesn’t seem notable. Closest claim is that his firm wa named top 100 in the country. That’s about it.
CountryANDWestern
talk
23:49, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
23:49, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Russo-Hotak War
change source
Russo-Hotak War
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
Barras
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Doubtable notability.
Barras
talk
20:37, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
20:37, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Play With Caution
change source
Play With Caution
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
No notability for this show is shown. It aired for four episodes and doesn't seem to have received coverage.
CountryANDWestern
talk
18:52, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
18:52, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Play TV (Radica)
change source
Play TV (Radica)
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
No notability shown for this console/product.
CountryANDWestern
talk
18:37, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
18:37, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Phillip Sarofim
change source
Phillip Sarofim
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Notability not established. The awards are just having a nice collection of cars at particular shows. Nothing that establishes notability.
CountryANDWestern
talk
14:39, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
14:39, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Philippine Institute of Chemical Engineers
change source
Philippine Institute of Chemical Engineers
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Notability of this organization is not shown.
CountryANDWestern
talk
14:36, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
14:36, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Philip Richard Gries
change source
Philip Richard Gries
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Notability not established through significant coverage in relaible sources. The Newsday article appears to be local in nature. Otherwise, the sources are databases, his own work, or passing mention of him.
CountryANDWestern
talk
14:35, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
14:35, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Petra Meerdink
change source
Petra Meerdink
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Notability not established.
CountryANDWestern
talk
13:43, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
13:43, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Per Zennstrom
change source
Per Zennstrom
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Notability not established through significant coverage in independent sources. The bulk of sources here are gallery listings or self-published type things. A couple of them are interviews on blogs. Nothing that shows any notability.
CountryANDWestern
talk
13:39, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
13:39, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Peter Tymms
change source
Peter Tymms
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Notability not established through significant coverage in independent sources. A couple are his own works or from his institutions. Otherwise, he is mentioned or quoted in articles, but the focus of those articles isn't on him.
CountryANDWestern
talk
13:21, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
13:21, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Peter Van Wagner
change source
Peter Van Wagner
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
No notability shown. Parts all seem to be minor roles.
CountryANDWestern
talk
13:19, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
13:19, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Peter Neil Galgut
change source
Peter Neil Galgut
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Notability not established through significant coverage in reliable sources. The sources are all his own works, his CV, or his research profile. The only one that isn't is an interview with him that can't be used to determine notability.
CountryANDWestern
talk
13:15, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
13:15, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Peter Rabbit (franchise)
change source
Peter Rabbit (franchise)
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Two movies isn't really a "franchise." No significant coverage to show that it is, in fact, a franchise and not just a movie and its sequel.
CountryANDWestern
talk
13:12, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
13:12, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Peter Dragone
change source
Peter Dragone
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Notability isn't established for him as an individual. The bulk of the sources here are for Keurig and his name is mentioned in the article. He does not seem to have significant coverage himself.
CountryANDWestern
talk
13:03, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
13:03, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Pero, Genoa
change source
Pero, Genoa
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Cannot verify this area's existence or notability.
CountryANDWestern
talk
12:58, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
12:58, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Peoples of Balkan in Turkey
change source
Peoples of Balkan in Turkey
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Article is kind of unclear as to what it's about. The title doesn't seem to help either. Without a clear focus/definition, it doesn't function as an article.
CountryANDWestern
talk
12:54, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
12:54, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Penny Ur
change source
Penny Ur
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Notability not shown through significant coverage in independent sources. Source 1 is a listing for an event she spoke at; Source 2 is her own writing; Source 3 (which is broken) is a press release from her publisher it seems. The OBE is not a title that automatically designates notability as something like 100K people have received it.
CountryANDWestern
talk
12:47, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
12:47, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Pentathletes (Carpenter Painter)
change source
Pentathletes (Carpenter Painter)
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Notability for this artwork isn't shown. Only reference is its listing from the collection it's in.
CountryANDWestern
talk
12:42, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
12:42, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
All You Need is Beatles (Album)
change source
All You Need is Beatles (Album)
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
Garsh2
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Seemingly non-notable album. The sources on the article do not show notability for the album under the
WP:GNG
. A search did not reveal any others.
Garsh
talk
21:46, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
Keep
All You Need is Beatles" does not violate WP:GNG as it is a recognized album by a Canadian artist, available on major streaming platforms, and has garnered attention from music fans and critics.
Preceding
unsigned
comment added by
~2026-24043-44
talk
contribs
21:50, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Delete
- none of the references linking it to streaming services show the album in any way (all 404s), and the self-reference does not provide any notability.
🤘🤘 DFRD
talk
22:16, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Need i say more?
2026-24043-44
talk
22:21, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Yes, that link works, but it still seems to fail
WP:NALBUM
. The artist has put it on Spotify, but there are no independent sources that cover the album. My first comment was more saying that most of the references used don't work, not that it being on a streaming service would make it notable.
🤘🤘 DFRD
talk
22:30, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
2026-24043-44
talk
22:21, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Delete
Availability on streaming platforms confirms existence, but per WP:GNG it does not establish notability. Reliable secondary sources with significant coverage are still needed.
Haxorpy
talk
08:41, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
This request is due to close on
21:46, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Religion in Victorian England
change source
Religion in Victorian England
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
Nathan Veritas
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
A4
🏹Nathan Veritas
13:07, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
Comment
- A4 is a quick deletion reason. It is about notability. This article isn't an A4 candidate. Please provide a more appropriate reason for deletion.
CountryANDWestern
talk
12:26, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
This request is due to close on
13:07, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
BHRT
change source
BHRT
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
Nathan Veritas
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
🏹Nathan Veritas
10:57, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
User:Nathan Veritas
please be sure articles do not qualify for
quick deletion
before nominating. Please also provide a rational for deletion so that other editors can respond to your argument. In this case, the article can be quickly deleted as A1.
Garsh
talk
21:51, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
This request is due to close on
10:57, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Henry B. Eyring
change source
Henry B. Eyring
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
Wekeepwhatwekill
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Fails Notability requirements. (Nothing showing that he IS notable, except publications from his church or appendant bodies). He would need reliable sources to show that he's notable.
Wekeepwhatwekill
Sp
ak!
00:52, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
Keep
. He’s notable within the LDS church and has a high role in the church. The article needing ref work is one thing but that shouldn’t automatically delete his page or question his notability. That’s why we have reference improve templates.
TDKR Chicago 101
talk
00:53, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Keep
- This individual is notable for his role with the church of LDS. Sources clearly exist, see the sources on
en:Henry B. Eyring
Garsh
talk
18:59, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Keep
- He is very notable within the LDS church and if the page is improved with information from the English Wikipedia, it would easily reflect that.
Wheatley2
talk
06:05, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
This request is due to close on
00:52, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Michael David
change source
Michael David
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
Garsh2
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
No sources provided that meet the
WP:GNG
. I searched and couldn't' find any that are not included.
Garsh
talk
15:41, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
15:41, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Rikard Djegadut
change source
Rikard Djegadut
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
Garsh2
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
The sources are mostly passing mentions or primary. Couldn't find anything else that shows notability.
Garsh
talk
15:40, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
Keep
🏹Nathan Veritas
10:03, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Any rational you'd like to provide? These are not votes.
Garsh
talk
19:01, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
This request is due to close on
15:40, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Pathiyanadu Sree Bhadrakali Temple
change source
Pathiyanadu Sree Bhadrakali Temple
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
No sources provided that show that this is a notable temple/shrine. The article has been written by people closely associated with it. If kept, this is likely a TNT situation where we'd need to strip it down to basic things.
CountryANDWestern
talk
11:41, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
11:41, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Pat Cosquer
change source
Pat Cosquer
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Notability not established by reliable, independent sources. The sources are almost all frmo his institutions and organizations. Similar concerns led to its deletion at En.
CountryANDWestern
talk
11:29, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
11:29, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Parvateesam
change source
Parvateesam
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Notability not established through significant coverage in reliable sources. Most of them jjust mention his name in a sentence; that he's playing X role in the movie. A lot of the sources are trailers which don't establish notability for him; they just show the film.
CountryANDWestern
talk
11:19, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
Delete
- not enough to show that
WP:NACTOR
is met, sources are basically puff interviews or passing mentions.
Ravensfire
talk
18:49, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
This request is due to close on
11:19, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Krishna Kumar
change source
Krishna Kumar
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
No notability shown. The single award is a nice honor, but 100+ people receive it annually so it's not an automatic denoter of notability.
CountryANDWestern
talk
10:53, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
10:53, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Parizad Shaikh
change source
Parizad Shaikh
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Sources provided do not appear to be reliable. The "DNA India" and "Star Weekly" appear to be the only two that aren't written by a desk editor. DNA India appears promotional with language like "Parizad Shaikh is an exemplary figure who embodies strength, power, and the potential for transformative change." Star Weekly is an interview. The status of the others as "desk editor" authors suggests promotional placeemnt.
CountryANDWestern
talk
10:49, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
10:49, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Parihar Rajputs
change source
Parihar Rajputs
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
No clear notability shown. The first two sources don't appear to mention this clan at all. The third source doesn't show much depth.
CountryANDWestern
talk
10:42, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
Keep it
as it is a very well known ethnic group of India and reference 2 talks about the pratihar/parihar rajput kings so why you want to delete this page.
2026-24367-76
talk
13:01, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
The sources don't clearly show that the group meets our notability standards.
CountryANDWestern
talk
13:13, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
As per my opinion we should
Keep
this article. I can fix the issues of this article, majorly the citation thing. There are a lot of such caste or clan based pages so i think we should not delete this too and rather fix it as per the wikipedia standards. Thanks
MrBeardalien
talk
13:22, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please provide some sources that show it is notable.
CountryANDWestern
talk
13:35, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Hey @
CountryANDWestern
, I have added some citations on that page along with necessary quotes related to this clan. Can you go through them and check if the claimed information on that page is well-cited now. I can also fix other issues on that page once we get some conclusion here.
MrBeardalien
talk
17:37, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
This request is due to close on
10:42, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Madherchod
change source
Madherchod
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Doesn't appear to be more than a DICDEF here. More develpoment would be needed with sources to show depth beyond a definition.
CountryANDWestern
talk
10:31, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
10:31, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Dr. Yanga's Colleges, Inc.
change source
Dr. Yanga's Colleges, Inc.
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Don't see any evidence that this is a notable institution.
CountryANDWestern
talk
10:29, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
10:29, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Rebecca Lees
change source
Rebecca Lees
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Doesn't appear to meet GNG notability standards. no sources are provided that establish her notability. A BEFORE search finds nothing but some unreliable websites/databases.
CountryANDWestern
talk
10:24, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
10:24, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Holy Family (Amisani)
change source
Holy Family (Amisani)
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
No notability shown for this painting.
CountryANDWestern
talk
13:31, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
and what reason do you have for it to be deleted since you didn't give one
Ieditsandyes
talk
13:46, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
As stated, there isn't notability shown.
CountryANDWestern
talk
13:59, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
This request is due to close on
13:31, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Hijan Hirao
change source
Hijan Hirao
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Notability is not established for this poem/text. The text is not mentioned, as far as I can see, in either of the two sources listed. The two other references are a book review of a translation of the text and a link to buy that translation.
CountryANDWestern
talk
12:32, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
Keep
: The article has "Bibliography" section and "Sources" section, apart from the inline citations of the references. And because of the inline citations' URLs getting broken in certain cases (usually because of previous bot activities in the article), the targeted pages might be misaligned, resulting in not seeing the targeted topic. Please recheck the sources and one will surely find the topic because I (author) don't put sources with zero relevance. Thanks!
HAOREIMA
Khurumjari
20:02, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
This request is due to close on
12:32, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Ougri festival
change source
Ougri festival
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Notability not established through significant coverage in reliable sources.
CountryANDWestern
talk
18:03, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
Keep
: Yes, it's a stub article which needs to be expanded but it already has enough citations to prove
WP:NOTABILITY
and
WP:RELIABLE
through
en:WP:THREE
. Plus, apart from inline citations, the article provides two additional sources in a separate section. All these third party independent sources have direct significant coverages of the annual event's different performances and activities (in different years' editions too). I see no reason for the article to be removed from the wiki as per the community guidelines! Instead, it could be expanded taking information from the inline citations.
HAOREIMA
Khurumjari
20:09, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
This request is due to close on
18:03, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Schizophrenic insight
change source
Schizophrenic insight
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
This article is kind of all over the place and I can't say that it seems like a topic "worthy" of an article. It's defining the word insight in general... It's talking about words having meaning. It's talking about how literacy may be similar to insight. Overall, it's not a clear focus and it's not clear that this concept is notable and clearly defined.
CountryANDWestern
talk
17:24, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
When I search for 'schizophrenic insight' I get a number of scholarly publications. So the term likely exists, as a medical technical term. So, this makes this situation a 'rewrite to fit our audience ' task, rather than deletion.--
Eptalon
talk
23:06, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
This request is due to close on
17:24, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Peppa Pig: The Golden Boots
change source
Peppa Pig: The Golden Boots
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Not all that notable of a TV episode. Reviews aren't from too reliable of sources it appears. It's also a complex copy of the draft version of this at En.
CountryANDWestern
talk
12:51, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Oh, you still think so? You still think I made a mistake here? So, in that case, can I turn this into a redirect?
Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira
talk
15:48, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Okay, decision made... And I decided to turn this into a redirect page, to avoid so much confusion... So, what do you think?
Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira
talk
21:38, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Oh, what a... So, good luck...
:(
Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira
talk
21:42, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
12:51, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
David Hryck
change source
David Hryck
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
Garsh2
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Non-notable person. Sources provided are primary or passing mentions, and I could not find any more online. Does not pass the
WP:GNG
Garsh
talk
21:49, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
I have added a few sources that support the claims made in his article, and many of them are not trivial/passing mentions.
2026-22670-58
talk
00:09, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
21:49, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Recently closed deletion discussions
change source
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this
request for deletion
was to
Delete
WP:SOFTDELETE
Ternera
talk
19:53, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Houma Hunter Lime: Special Collection Vol. 1
change source
Houma Hunter Lime: Special Collection Vol. 1
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
No notability is shown or verifiable for this video game.
CountryANDWestern
talk
15:22, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
15:22, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
The above discussion is preserved as an
archive
Please do not change it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this
request for deletion
was to
Delete
Ternera
talk
19:52, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Syed Hasan Imam Rizvi Zangipuri
change source
Syed Hasan Imam Rizvi Zangipuri
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
Garsh2
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
I could find no sources with an online source, and those provided in the articles are mostly interviews and videos of events. This subject does not pass the
WP:GNG
Garsh
talk
21:46, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
Socks have been blocked. Please add actual votes below.
Strong keep
– The nomination does not sufficiently satisfy deletion standards under Wikipedia policy. Per
WP:BEFORE
, a thorough search for reliable sources must be conducted prior to nomination. The claim that no sources exist appears premature and may reflect incomplete searching, particularly for regional, print, or non-English/Urdu sources which are often not easily accessible online.
Furthermore, the subject is likely to meet
WP:GNG
as there is a reasonable expectation of significant coverage in independent sources. The current reliance on interviews or event-based references does not negate notability; rather, it indicates that the article requires improvement, not deletion.
Per
WP:SIGCOV
, notability is based on the existence of significant coverage, not merely the current state of citations within the article. Absence of inline citations is an editorial issue, not grounds for deletion.
Additionally, per
WP:ATD
(Alternatives to Deletion), improvement, sourcing, or tagging (e.g.,
more citations needed
) should be preferred over removal.
Deletion at this stage would be premature and against the spirit of Wikipedia’s inclusion principles. The article should be improved and expanded with proper sourcing instead.
Recommendation:
Keep and improve.
Alex Renford
talk
06:03, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Strong keep
– The nomination appears premature and does not fully comply with
WP:BEFORE
, which requires a diligent search for reliable sources prior to proposing deletion. The absence of easily accessible online citations does not equate to a lack of notability, especially for subjects covered in regional, print, or non-English sources.
The subject plausibly meets
WP:GNG
through likely significant coverage in independent sources. Current references such as interviews or event documentation do not disqualify the topic; they simply indicate that the article is underdeveloped. Per
WP:SIGCOV
, notability depends on the existence of coverage, not the current completeness of citations in the article.
Additionally, Wikipedia is not limited to online-only verification. Offline and regional sources are valid per policy, and their absence in the article at present reflects an editorial gap, not a notability failure.
Per
WP:ATD
(Alternatives to Deletion), the correct approach here is improvement, not removal. Tagging the article for better sourcing (e.g.,
refimprove
or
more citations needed
) and allowing time for expansion would align with Wikipedia’s content development process.
There is also no clear evidence presented that the subject fails notability; instead, the rationale relies on current sourcing limitations, which is insufficient for deletion.
Conclusion:
Keep and improve. Deletion would be premature and contrary to policy.
Jesus Alvarez Calderon
talk
06:08, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Strong keep
– The nomination fails to meet the required standard for deletion and appears premature. Under
WP:BEFORE
, nominators are expected to conduct a thorough and good-faith search for reliable, independent sources. The assertion that sources do not exist is not substantiated and likely reflects a limited search, particularly given the common availability of coverage in regional, print, or non-English media.
Crucially, the burden of proof lies with the nominator to demonstrate that the subject does
not
meet notability guidelines. Simply pointing to a lack of currently formatted inline citations does not satisfy this burden. Per
WP:GNG
and
WP:SIGCOV
, notability is determined by the existence of significant coverage in reliable sources, not the present condition of the article.
The argument presented conflates verifiability with notability. These are distinct concepts: an article may be poorly sourced yet still be notable. In such cases, Wikipedia policy clearly favors improvement over deletion.
Per
WP:ATD
(Alternatives to Deletion), there are multiple appropriate remedies short of deletion, including:
Adding reliable sources
Tagging with
refimprove
or
more citations needed
Expanding the article with verifiable content
No evidence has been provided that the subject fails notability; rather, the rationale is based on current sourcing gaps, which is explicitly insufficient for deletion. Additionally, many biographies from underrepresented regions are systemically under-documented online, and immediate deletion in such cases contributes to systemic bias.
Conclusion:
Keep. The article requires improvement, not deletion. The nomination does not meet policy-based grounds for removal.
Shah Syed Muhammad Ali
talk
06:15, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Keep
– The article may currently lack strong sourcing, but that is an issue of improvement rather than notability. It is likely that reliable sources exist but have not yet been added. Per
WP:ATD
, improving and expanding the article would be more appropriate than deletion.
JabirAhmedAnsari
talk
06:17, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Note: All AI-sockpuppets reported.
NDG
talk
06:17, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Some of the Sources available are N:POV maybe keep article and suggest for improvement!
2026-23149-19
talk
14:33, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
I would recommend keeping the article. While it’s true that some of the currently cited sources are interviews or event-based coverage, that does not automatically disqualify the subject from meeting notability guidelines. Such sources can still contribute to establishing notability, especially if they come from reputable outlets.
Additionally, the lack of strong inline citations at present appears to be more of a sourcing gap than evidence of non-notability. This is a fixable issue. A reasonable approach would be to retain the article and tag it for improvement, giving editors the opportunity to add more robust, independent, and secondary sources.
Per WP:BEFORE, deletion should be a last resort, and further source searching may yet yield better coverage. Therefore, I support keeping the article and improving it rather than deleting it at this stage.
2026-23147-86
talk
14:01, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
I would recommend keeping the article. While it’s true that some of the currently cited sources are interviews or event-based coverage, that does not automatically disqualify the subject from meeting notability guidelines. Such sources can still contribute to establishing notability, especially if they come from reputable outlets.
Additionally, the lack of strong inline citations at present appears to be more of a sourcing gap than evidence of non-notability. This is a fixable issue. A reasonable approach would be to retain the article and tag it for improvement, giving editors the opportunity to add more robust, independent, and secondary sources.
Per WP:BEFORE, deletion should be a last resort, and further source searching may yet yield better coverage. Therefore, I support keeping the article and improving it rather than deleting it at this stage.
2026-23147-86
talk
14:01, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Delete
as the nominator noted, the sources are questionable, and the use of archive.org directly feels deceptive at best. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources, just fluff pieces and connected sources. There's some good analysis at
w:Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Syed_Hasan_Imam_Rizvi_Zangipuri
which closed in Jan 2026.
Ravensfire
talk
15:51, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
This request is due to close on
21:46, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
The above discussion is preserved as an
archive
Please do not change it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this
request for deletion
was to
Delete
WP:SOFTDELETE
Ternera
talk
19:51, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Homophrosyne
change source
Homophrosyne
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
No notability shown for this term/word. It's basically a dicdef here.
CountryANDWestern
talk
13:39, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
13:39, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
The above discussion is preserved as an
archive
Please do not change it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this
request for deletion
was to
Delete
WP:SOFTDELETE
Ternera
talk
19:50, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Hoor Fatima
change source
Hoor Fatima
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Notability not established with reliable sources. The Daily Exlesior and the The Tribute read like press releases. Doesn't seem to be notable overall -- she won a specific tournament for under 6 year olds, not a grander achievement.
CountryANDWestern
talk
13:52, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
13:52, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
The above discussion is preserved as an
archive
Please do not change it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this
request for deletion
was to
Delete
WP:SOFTDELETE
Ternera
talk
19:50, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Houma Hunter Lime with Paint Maker
change source
Houma Hunter Lime with Paint Maker
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
No notability is shown for this video game.
CountryANDWestern
talk
15:24, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
15:24, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
The above discussion is preserved as an
archive
Please do not change it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this
request for deletion
was to
Delete
WP:SOFTDELETE
Ternera
talk
19:49, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Toshiba satellite CL10-B-100
change source
Toshiba satellite CL10-B-100
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
No clear notability of this particular model of laptop is shown. En. has an article on the series of laptops and a table with the models, but not individual articles on the models. We certainly don't need a specs list like this as we're not a consumer/tech guide.
CountryANDWestern
talk
15:34, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
15:34, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
The above discussion is preserved as an
archive
Please do not change it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this
request for deletion
was to
Delete
WP:SOFTDELET
Ternera
talk
19:48, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
House of Okori
change source
House of Okori
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Article doesn't clearly demonstrate the notability of this house with reliable sources. The sources are mostly about achievements of individuals who are claimed to be part of this house, or are unreliable research papers.
CountryANDWestern
talk
15:38, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
15:38, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
The above discussion is preserved as an
archive
Please do not change it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this
request for deletion
was to
Delete
WP:SOFTDELET
Ternera
talk
19:47, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Dashnak offensive into Iranian Azerbaijan
change source
Dashnak offensive into Iranian Azerbaijan
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
I cannot verify the information and sources to determine if this is a notable event. Searching for the sources results in their names in various bibliographies, but I cannot locate the sources themselves. Significant
verifability issues
. If kept, better sources will be needed and simplification must occur.
CountryANDWestern
talk
18:24, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
18:24, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
The above discussion is preserved as an
archive
Please do not change it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this
request for deletion
was to
Delete
WP:SOFTDELETE
Ternera
talk
19:47, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Oxana Saichuk
change source
Oxana Saichuk
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
No notability shown for this athlete. The sources only provide confirm that she competed in these competitions in the form of boxscores or database type entries.
CountryANDWestern
talk
18:40, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
18:40, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
The above discussion is preserved as an
archive
Please do not change it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this
request for deletion
was to
Delete
WP:SOFTDELETE
Ternera
talk
19:46, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
PBS Kids Preschool Block
change source
PBS Kids Preschool Block
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
No sources can be found that show that this is a notable block of programming.
CountryANDWestern
talk
18:47, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
18:47, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
The above discussion is preserved as an
archive
Please do not change it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this
request for deletion
was to
Delete
WP:SOFTDELETE
Ternera
talk
19:46, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Pa Sulay Njie
change source
Pa Sulay Njie
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Sources don't confirm him as someone who has played at an upper level of international soccer/football. See
en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pa Sulay Njie
which concluded this as non-notable and a potential hoax.
CountryANDWestern
talk
18:51, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
18:51, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
The above discussion is preserved as an
archive
Please do not change it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this
request for deletion
was to
Delete
WP:SOFTDELETE
Ternera
talk
19:45, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
.flow
change source
.flow
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Not clearly a notable game. Looks like it’s a fan game inspired by a more notable game. Needs sources to prove it is notable.
CountryANDWestern
talk
00:25, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
00:25, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
The above discussion is preserved as an
archive
Please do not change it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this
request for deletion
was to
Delete
WP:SOFTDELETE
Ternera
talk
19:44, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Padum Pukhuri
change source
Padum Pukhuri
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
No notability shown for this pond. No sources show it is significant. If kept, significant copy editing is needed.
CountryANDWestern
talk
00:31, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
00:31, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
The above discussion is preserved as an
archive
Please do not change it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this
request for deletion
was to
Delete
WP:SOFTDELETE
Ternera
talk
19:44, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Paintings of Scottish monarchs
change source
Paintings of Scottish monarchs
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Maybe out of project scope? I'm not sure that a gallery of paintings is necessary. I'm not sure of a precedent for this.
CountryANDWestern
talk
14:20, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
14:20, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
The above discussion is preserved as an
archive
Please do not change it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this
request for deletion
was to
Delete
WP:SOFTDELETE
Ternera
talk
19:43, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Palazzo Vigentina
change source
Palazzo Vigentina
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Can't find any sources that show that this is a notable residential building.
CountryANDWestern
talk
14:30, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
14:30, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
The above discussion is preserved as an
archive
Please do not change it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this
request for deletion
was to
Delete
WP:SOFTDELETE
Ternera
talk
19:43, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Palazzo Vigoni
change source
Palazzo Vigoni
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Can't find any sources that show this is a notable residential building.
CountryANDWestern
talk
14:31, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
14:31, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
The above discussion is preserved as an
archive
Please do not change it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this
request for deletion
was to
Delete
WP:SOFTDELETE
Ternera
talk
19:42, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Paola Santana
change source
Paola Santana
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
The claims in this article feel "audacious" and hard to prove. The claim of creating the first constitutional court in a nation is significant, but I can find no proof that she actually did aside from summaries of her bio in articles/interviews. It definitely has UPE vibes with the author making no other edits until 5 years later for another individual. Many of the sources are dead or unavailable, and many do not show significant coverage of her but rather her companies.
CountryANDWestern
talk
17:24, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
17:24, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
The above discussion is preserved as an
archive
Please do not change it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this
request for deletion
was to
Delete
WP:SOFTDELETE
Ternera
talk
19:42, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Paolo Tasca
change source
Paolo Tasca
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
delete
close request
open RfD subpage
CountryANDWestern
has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
Likely UPE based on the author's single edit and the history at
en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paolo Tasca (professor)
and
en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paolo Tasca
. He does not seem to pass GNG or NPROF standards. The sources here are primary for the most part or show passing mention of him.
CountryANDWestern
talk
17:27, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
reply
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that
you shouldn't vote on everything
and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change source
This request is due to close on
17:27, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
, seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
The above discussion is preserved as an
archive
Please do not change it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "
Category
Requests for deletion that succeeded
Wikipedia
Requests for deletion
Add topic