Blog, Podcast, Vodcast and Wiki Copyright Guide for Australia Anthony Austin, Jessica Coates, Hannah Donnelly, and Professor Brian Fitzgerald assisted by Peter Black, Kylie Pappalardo, Nic Suzor and Emma Carroll This Guide is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonComm…
…in the photograph. Information is available at the Personality rights in Mexico wiki entry at the University of Edinburgh Law School Taking a picture of a person in a public space: Does not require consent Publishing pictures of a person in a public space: May require consent (se…
…in the photograph. Information is available at the Personality rights in Mexico wiki entry at the University of Edinburgh Law School Taking a picture of a person in a public space: Does not require consent Publishing pictures of a person in a public space: May require consent (se…
…in the photograph. Information is available at the Personality rights in Mexico wiki entry at the University of Edinburgh Law School Taking a picture of a person in a public space: Does not require consent Publishing pictures of a person in a public space: May require consent (se…
…ty is blatantly bureaucratic and is definitely bad faith, and goes against what Wikipedia stands for. Community consensus should be the the final say on content, not an elected body that we have to hope are doing the right thing. Kirbanzo ( userpage - talk - contribs ) 14:23, 17 …
User talk:Danny Benjafield (WMDE) - Meta-Wiki Jump to content From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki Latest comment: 3 days ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic Wikidata weekly summary #728 Welcome to my Discussion page Feel free to say Hi! WM Hackathon (OoO): May…
…) has set up an initiative to document Scotland’s intangible heritage through a Wiki inventory (http://www.unesco.org.uk/documenting_intangible_cultural_heritage_%28ich%29 _in_scotland); an initiative directly influenced by the UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible…
Wikipedia:Geselshoekie/Argief2020 - Wikipedia Gaan na inhoud in Wikipedia, die vrye ensiklopedie Wikipedia:Geselshoekie Hierdie bladsy dien as 'n argief van ou besprekings. Moenie die inhoud van hierdie bladsy wysig nie. Indien u 'n nuwe bespreking wil begin, of by een van die ou…
Wikipedia:Nyhetsbrev – Wikipedia Hoppa till innehållet Från Wikipedia Nyhetsbrev från Wikimediarörelsen . Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #218 is out: Wikifunctions available on 123 Wiktionary languages [ redigera | redigera wikitext ] There is a new update for Wiki…
…le to grant accesses , apply bot flags, uncover CheckUser information, on every Wikimedia project, in every language. This year, voting for the 2007 Steward elections began on 26 November (at 00:00:01 UTC), and ended on 16 December (at 23:59:59 UTC). Voting has ended so please do…
…g the talk pages of drafts, so they get put in the various WP:AALERTS notice of Wikiprojects. It works pretty well at WP:JOURNALS and WP:WPWIR and other involved projects. Headbomb { t · c · p · b } 19:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC) I don't see what benefit the current use of draft s…
…p a page to organise how best to tackle improving the Penwith pages here , as a wikiproject - feel free to add your name to the list. there isn't much there yet as we haven't had much time to organise lists of things to do yet, but the idea is to write down a list of things that …
Requests for comment/Should the Foundation call itself Wikipedia - Meta-Wiki Jump to content From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki < Requests for comment Latest comment: 5 years ago by Wagner67 in topic Question The following request for comments is closed. comment exp…
… stating that they did not find it acceptable for the Foundation to call itself Wikipedia At 24 minutes and 40 seconds in, during this Wikimedia Foundation branding proposal presentation of April 11, 2019 used as the basis for the community consultation, Zack McCune, User:ZMcCune…
…aborate. — Justin ( ko a vf ) ❤ T ☮ C ☺ M ☯ 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…